Publius-Huldah's Blog

Understanding the Constitution

CONGRESS’ ENUMERATED POWERS

By Publius Huldah

1.  With the U.S. Constitution, We The People created the federal government.  It is our “creature”, and has no powers other than those We delegated to it in Our Constitution.

Webster’s American Dictionary of the English Language (1828), says re “constitution”:

“…In free states, the constitution is paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature, limiting and controlling its power; and in the United States, the legislature is created, and its powers designated, by the constitution.” [boldface mine]

If  you, dear Reader, will study this paper and read the Constitution, you will know more about it than most State & federal judges, most law professors & lawyers, those who spout off on TV & radio, just about anybody in Congress, and the self-educated who fixate on their own idiotic theories.  And you will certainly know more than anyone currently occupying any office in the executive branch of the federal government.

2. The federal government 1 has three branches: Article I of the Constitution creates the Legislative Branch (Congress) & lists its powers; Article II creates the Executive Branch & lists its powers (President); and Article III creates the Judicial Branch (federal courts) & lists its powers.

In this paper, we will consider only the enumerated powers of Congress. But the powers of the other two branches are likewise strictly limited and enumerated.

3. Congress is NOT authorized to pass any law on any subject just because a majority in Congress think the law is a good idea!  Instead, the areas in which Congress is authorized to act are strictly limited and defined (“enumerated”).

WE delegated to Congress the following Enumerated Powers over the Country at Large:

Article I, § 8, clauses 1-16 delegate to Congress the powers:

(1) To lay certain taxes;

(2) To pay the debts of the United States;

(3) To declare war and make rules of warfare, to raise and support armies and a navy and to make rules governing the military forces; to call forth the militia for certain purposes, and to make rules governing the militia;

(4) To regulate commerce with foreign Nations, and among the States, and with the Indian Tribes;

(5) To establish uniform Rules of Naturalization;

(6) To establish uniform Laws on Bankruptcies;

(7) To coin money and regulate the value thereof;

(8) To fix the standard of Weights and Measures;

(9) To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting;

(10) To establish post offices and post roads;

(11) To issue patents and copyrights;

(12) To create courts inferior to the supreme court; and

(13) To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the Laws of Nations.

Other provisions of Our Constitution delegate to Congress powers over the Country at Large to make laws regarding:

(14) An enumeration of the population for purposes of apportionment of Representatives and direct taxes (Art. I, § 2, cl. 3);

(15) Elections of Senators & Representatives (Art. I, §4, cl. 1) and their pay (Art. I, § 6);

(16) After 1808, to prohibit importation of slaves (Art. I, § 9, cl. 1); 2

(17) After 1808, to restrict migration (immigration) to these United States (Art. I, §9, cl. 1);

(18) A restricted power to suspend Writs of Habeas Corpus (Art. I, §9, cl. 2);

(19) To revise and control imposts or duties on imports or exports which may be laid by States (Art. I, § 10, cl. 2 &3)

(20) A restricted power to declare the punishment of Treason (Art. III, §3, cl. 2);

(21) Implementation of the Full Faith and Credit clause (Art. IV, §1); and,

(22) Procedures for amendments to The Constitution (Art. V).

The 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 19th, 23rd,  24th, & 26th Amendments delegated additional powers to Congress over the Country at Large respecting certain civil rights & certain voting rights, the public debt [lawfully incurred], income tax, successions to vacated offices, dates of assembly, and appointment of representatives from the D.C.

So!  In a nutshell, the powers WE delegated to Congress over the Country at Large fall into four categories:

♠ International relations, commerce and war;

♠ Control immigration by restricting who may come to these United States, and establish a uniform rule of naturalization of new citizens;

♠ Domestically, to establish a uniform commercial system: weights & measures, patents & copyrights, a monetary system based on gold & silver, bankruptcy law, a [limited] power over interstate commerce, and mail delivery.

♠And in some of the Amendments, to protect certain civil and certain voting rights.

That’s it!  All other powers are retained by the States or the People.

Federal Enclaves & Territories:

4. Two provisions of Our Constitution grant to Congress broad legislative powers over these two categories of specifically defined geographical areas:

a)  Federal Enclaves: Article I, §8, next to last clause, grants to Congress “exclusive Legislation” over the following geographically tiny areas:  the seat of the government of the United States (not to exceed 10 square miles), forts, arsenals, dock-yards, and the like. As James Madison said in Federalist No. 43 at 2., it is necessary for the government of the United States to have “complete authority” at the seat of government, and over forts, magazines, etc. established by the federal government.

b)  Territories: Article IV, §3, cl. 2 grants to Congress power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other property belonging to the United States (as opposed to property belonging to individual states).  As these territories became States, Congress’ powers under this Article were terminated.

Congress may not lawfully exercise ANY other powers!

5. Thus, Congress has NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to bail out financial institutions, businesses, and homeowners who don’t pay their mortgages; NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to take control of our health care; NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to pass laws denying secret ballots to employees who are solicited for membership by labor unions; NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to take away your IRA’s and other retirement accounts, NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to take your guns, NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to pass laws respecting energy consumption or “emissions”, education, housing, etc., etc., etc.

Therefore, all laws which Congress has made on such topics are unconstitutional as outside the scope of the legislative powers WE delegated to Congress in OUR Constitution. WE THE PEOPLE did not give such powers to Congress when we ordained and established the Constitution, created the Congress, and listed its 22 enumerated powers over the Country at large. And WE did not delegate those powers to Congress in any of the Amendments.

6. You ask, “How can Congress make all these laws if they are unconstitutional?

Congress gets away with it because WE are ignorant of what our Constitution says; and We have been indoctrinated into believing that Congress can do whatever they want!

Consider Prohibition:  Up to 1919, everyone still understood that The Constitution did not give Congress authority to simply “pass a law” banning alcoholic beverages!  So the Constitution was amended to prohibit alcoholic beverages, and to authorize Congress to make laws to enforce the prohibition (18th Amdt.).

But after the Progressives took over the federal government during the early 1900s, the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. The Progressives are the ones who imposed the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, and benefits some people [e.g., welfare parasites, labor unions & obama donors] at the expense of others.

The Progressives claimed the power to determine what is in the “public interest” and have the federal government implement their notions of what advances the “public interest”.

Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; but would follow the “will of the people” as expressed by their representatives in the federal government.  In other words, the Progressives gave the federal government a blank check to fill out anyway they want.

During the regime of Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), all three branches of the federal government abandoned the Constitution: FDR proposed “New Deal” programs; Congress passed them. At first, the Supreme Court ruled (generally 5 to 4) that these programs were unconstitutional as outside the legislative powers delegated to Congress. But when FDR threatened to “pack the court” by adding judges who would do his bidding, one judge flipped to the liberal/progressive side, and the Court started approving FDR’s programs (5 to 4).

7. Since then, law schools don’t teach the Constitution. Instead, they teach decisions of the FDR-dominated supreme Court which purport to explain why Congress has the power to regulate anything it pleases. The law schools thus produced generations of constitutionally illiterate lawyers and judges who have been wrongly taught that three clauses, the “general welfare” clause, the “interstate commerce” clause and the “necessary & proper” clause, permit Congress to do whatever it wants!

8. “Well”, you ask, “what aboutthe general welfare clause’?  Doesn’t that give Congress power to pass any law on any subject as long as it is for the ‘general Welfare of the United States’ “?  NO, IT DOES NOT!

First, you must learn what “welfare” meant when the Constitution was ratified:  “Welfare” as used in the Preamble & in Art. 1, §8, cl. 1, U.S. Constitution, meant

“Exemption from any unusual evil or calamity; the enjoyment of peace and prosperity, or the ordinary blessings of society and civil government” (Webster’s, 1828).

But The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (1969), added a new meaning: “Public relief – on welfare.  Dependent on public relief”.  Do you see how our Constitution is perverted when new meanings are substituted for original meanings?

Second, James Madison addresses this precise issue in Federalist No. 41 (last 4 paras):  Madison points out that the first paragraph of Art. I, §8 employs “general terms” which are “immediately” followed by the “enumeration of particular powers” which “explain and qualify”, by a “recital of particulars”, the general terms.   So, yes!  The powers of Congress really are restricted to those listed herein above.

OUR FOUNDERS UNDERSTOOD that the “general Welfare”, i.e., the enjoyment of peace & prosperity, and the enjoyment of the ordinary blessings of society & civil government, was possible only with a civil government which was strictly limited & restricted in what it was given power to do!

9. “OK”, you say, “but what aboutthe commerce clause’ (Art. I, §8, cl. 3)?  Doesn’t that give Congress power to pass laws on any subject which ‘affects’ ‘interstate commerce’ “?  NO, IT DOES NOT! In Federalist No. 22 (4th para) and Federalist No. 42 (11th &12th paras), Alexander Hamilton & James Madison explain the purpose of the “interstate commerce” clause:  It is to prohibit the States from imposing tolls and tariffs on articles of import and export – merchandize – as they are transported through the States for purposes of buying and selling. That’s what it does, Folks; and until the mid-1930’s and FDR’s “New Deal”, this was widely understood. 3

10. “Well, then”, you say, “doesn’t the ‘necessary & proper’ clause’  ["elastic clause"  or "sweeping clause" ] (Art. I, §8, last clause) allow Congress to make any laws which the people in Congress think are ‘necessary & proper’?” NO, IT DOES NOT!  Alexander Hamilton says the clause merely gives to Congress a power to pass all laws necessary & proper to execute its declared powers (Federalist No. 29, 4th para); a power to do something must be a power to pass all laws necessary & proper for the execution of that power (Federalist No. 33, 4th para); “the constitutional operation of the intended government would be precisely the same if [this clause] were entirely obliterated as if [it] were repeated in every article” (Federalist No. 33, 2nd para); and thus the clause is “perfectly harmless”, a tautology or redundancy. (Federalist No. 33, 4th para).  James Madison agrees with Hamilton’s explanation. (Federalist No. 44, 10th-17th paras). In other words, the clause simply permits the execution of powers already declared and granted. Hamilton & Madison are clear that no additional substantive powers are granted by this clause.

11. The 10th Amendment states:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

So!  If a power is not delegated by Our Constitution to the federal government; and if the States are not prohibited (as by Art. I, § 10) from exercising that power; then that power is retained by the States or by The People.  And WE are The People”!

12. Our Framers insisted repeatedly that Congress is restricted to its enumerated powers.  James Madison says in Federalist No. 45 (9th para):

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.  The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.  The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people…” [emphasis mine]

In Federalist No. 39 (14th para):

“…the proposed government cannot be deemed a national one; since its jurisdiction extends to certain enumerated objects only, and leaves to the several States a residuary and inviolable sovereignity over all other objects.”

and in Federalist No. 14 (8th para):

“…the general [federal] government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects…”  [emphasis mine]

13. In all its recent legislation, Congress ratchets up its concerted pattern of lawless usurpations.  The executive branch and the federal courts approve it.  Such is the essence of tyranny.  They are “ruling” without our consent, and hence the federal government is now illegitimate. PH

Endnotes:

1 “Federal” refers to the form of government:  An alliance of States associated in a “federation” with a national government to which is delegated supremacy over the States in specifically defined areas ONLY.

2 Some object that our Constitution endorsed slavery. During the 18th century, slavery was universal. But Article I, § 9, clause 1, is our Proclamation to the World that WE would abolish the slave trade!  James Madison wanted the “barbarism” & “unnatural traffic” of the slave trade abolished immediately (Federalist Paper No. 42, 6th para).

3 See Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in United States v. Lopez (1995).  Justice Thomas’ opinion shows why those disposed to usurp attack him so virulently.

Revised July 1, 2009; Sep 8, 2009; Oct. 17, 2010; Jan 3, 2013; Feb. 4, 2013

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to Google BookmarkAdd to MySpaceAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Twitter

September 8, 2009 - Posted by | Elastic clause, Enumerated Powers of Congress, General Welfare Clause, Interstate Commerce Clause, Necessary and Proper clause, sweeping clause | , , , , ,

111 Comments »

  1. [...] within the Executive Branch of the federal government. This Model may be easily adapted to address acts of Congress which are outside the scope of its enumerated powers; Executive Orders which are outside the scope of the President’s enumerated powers; and supreme [...]

    Pingback by Model Nullification Resolutions for State Legislatures | March 14, 2012 | Reply

  2. [...] a monetary system based on gold & silver, bankruptcy laws, and mail delivery). Those enumerated powers are the only areas wherein the national government has lawful (constitutional) authority over The [...]

    Pingback by National Popular Vote: Goodbye, Sweet America. | American Conservative News Politics & Opinion - The Land of the Free | February 17, 2012 | Reply

  3. [...] a monetary system based on gold & silver, bankruptcy laws, and mail delivery). Those enumerated powersare the only areas wherein the national government has lawful (constitutional) authority over The [...]

    Pingback by National Popular Vote: Goodbye, Sweet America. | Grumpy Opinions | February 11, 2012 | Reply

  4. [...] the progressive agenda. They don’t know that Our Constitution created a Congress with limited and enumerated powers.  They don’t know that the President’s powers are “carefully limited; both in … extent and [...]

    Pingback by Why Republican Politicians Sell Us Out. | American Conservative News Politics & Opinion - The Land of the Free | February 2, 2012 | Reply

  5. [...] the progressive agenda. They don’t know that Our Constitution created a Congress with limited and enumerated powers. They don’t know that the President’s powers are “carefully limited; both in … extent and [...]

    Pingback by Why GOP Politicians Sell Out | Lake Minnetonka Liberty | January 31, 2012 | Reply

  6. [...] [...]

    Pingback by Publius Huldah - WHY REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS SELL US OUT | January 29, 2012 | Reply

  7. [...] progressive agenda. They don’t know that Our Constitution created a Congress with limited and enumerated powers. They don’t know that the President’s powers are “carefully limited; both in … extent and [...]

    Pingback by WHY REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS SELL US OUT | Grumpy Opinions | January 28, 2012 | Reply

  8. [...] progressive agenda. They don’t know that Our Constitution created a Congress with limited and enumerated powers. They don’t know that the President’s powers are “carefully limited; both in … extent and [...]

    Pingback by WHY REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS SELL US OUT « A NATION BEGUILED | January 28, 2012 | Reply

  9. Bill Whittle produced an excellent video on the subject.

    How To Steal Power pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=56&load=6209

    Comment by The Originalist | October 27, 2011 | Reply

    • Hi, Originalist! Glad to hear from you. I’m on slow internet access and it takes a very long time to watch even a 7 min. video if it won’t download onto my ‘puter. From the captions of the video, it sounds as if he understand that the Regressives on the supreme Court have used the so-called “interstate commerce” and “general welfare” clauses to justify usurpations of power by Congress. It’s about time the Word started getting out! How long does it take to filter down to the masses? And will they care?

      I’ve been wondering how you are. Send me an email and bring me up to date.

      Comment by Publius/Huldah | October 29, 2011 | Reply

  10. [...] Congress’ Powers are enumerated.  Thus, the objects on which Congress may lawfully appropriate funds are limited to those listed in the Constitution.  Congress has ignored the limitations on its powers for many decades – but at least the limitations are still in the Constitution, to be invoked if We The People ever repent. 2 [...]

    Pingback by STOP!! OR I”LL SHOOT PARTS 1&2 « A NATION BEGUILED | July 19, 2011 | Reply

  11. [...] Congress’ Powers are enumerated.  Thus, the objects on which Congress may lawfully appropriate funds are limited to those listed in the Constitution.  Congress has ignored the limitations on its powers for many decades – but at least the limitations are still in the Constitution, to be invoked if We The People ever repent. 2 [...]

    Pingback by STOP!! OR I”LL SHOOT PART 1 « A Nation Beguiled | July 19, 2011 | Reply

  12. [...] Congress’ Powers are Enumerated.  Thus, the objects on which Congress may lawfully appropriate funds are limited to those listed in the Constitution.  Congress has ignored the limitations on its powers for many decades – but at least the limitations are still in the Constitution, to be invoked if We The People ever repent. 2 [...]

    Pingback by Lux Libertas – Light and Liberty » Why the “Balanced Budget Amendment” is a Hoax and a Deadly Trap | July 15, 2011 | Reply

  13. [...] Congress’ Powers are Enumerated.  Thus, the objects on which Congress may lawfully appropriate funds are limited to those listed in the Constitution.  Congress has ignored the limitations on its powers for many decades – but at least the limitations are still in the Constitution, to be invoked if We The People ever repent. 2 [...]

    Pingback by OBAMA WALKS OUT OF DEBT TALKS – Demands His Tax Hikes | askmarion | July 14, 2011 | Reply

  14. [...]  Congress’ Powers are Enumerated.  Thus, the objects on which Congress may lawfully appropriate funds are limited to those listed in the Constitution.  Congress has ignored the limitations on its powers for many decades – but at least the limitations are still in the Constitution, to be invoked if We The People ever repent. 2 [...]

    Pingback by Why the “Balanced Budget Amendment” is a Hoax and a Deadly Trap – Tea Party Nation « Gds44's Blog | July 13, 2011 | Reply

  15. [...] Congress’ Powers are Enumerated.  Thus, the objects on which Congress may lawfully appropriate funds are limited to those listed in the Constitution.  Congress has ignored the limitations on its powers for many decades – but at least the limitations are still in the Constitution, to be invoked if We The People ever repent. 2 [...]

    Pingback by Why the “Balanced Budget Amendmment” is a Hoax and a Deadly Trap | Tennesseans Watching Federal & State Government | July 13, 2011 | Reply

  16. [...] Congress’ Powers are enumerated.  Thus, the objects on which Congress may lawfully appropriate funds are limited to those listed in the Constitution.  Congress has ignored the limitations on its powers for many decades, but at least the limitations are in the Constitution, to be invoked if  We the People ever repent. 2 [...]

    Pingback by The Balanced Budget Amendment is a Scam | AirCrap.org | July 11, 2011 | Reply

  17. [...] Congress’ Powers are enumerated.  Thus, the objects on which Congress may lawfully appropriate funds are limited to those listed in the Constitution.  Congress has ignored the limitations on its powers for many decades – but at least the limitations are still in the Constitution, to be invoked if We The People ever repent. 2 [...]

    Pingback by Why the “Balanced Budget Amendment” is a Hoax – and a Deadly Trap by Publius Huldah | Questioning With Boldness… | June 28, 2011 | Reply

  18. [...] was a Constitution which ordained and established a Federation of States which united only for THE LIMITED PURPOSES enumerated in the Constitution: national defense, international commerce & relations; and [...]

    Pingback by How Progressive Education and Bad Philosophy Corrupted The People & Undermined The Constitution of The United States – Publius Huldah, Back To Basics | Rightlinks Blog – Greece: Setting the standard for Democrats everywhere | April 29, 2011 | Reply

  19. [...] throughout our Country are itemized at Art. I, Sec. 8, clauses 1-16 (and in a few Amendments).  Here is an explanation of Congress’ Enumerated [...]

    Pingback by The Oath Of Office: The Check On Usurpations By Congress, The Executive Branch, & Federal Judges. | April 3, 2011 | Reply

  20. [...] throughout our Country are itemized at Art. I, Sec. 8, clauses 1-16(and in a few Amendments). Here is an explanation of Congress’ Enumerated [...]

    Pingback by The Oath Of Office: The Check On Usurpations By Congress, The Executive Branch, & Federal Judges « Veteran Patriot | March 30, 2011 | Reply

  21. [...] our Country are itemized at Art. I, Sec. 8, clauses 1-16 (and in a few Amendments).  Here is an explanation of Congress’ Enumerated [...]

    Pingback by THE OATH OF OFFICE « A Nation Beguiled | March 29, 2011 | Reply

  22. [...] was a Constitution which ordained and established a Federation of States which united only for THE LIMITED PURPOSES enumerated in the Constitution: national defense, international commerce & relations; and [...]

    Pingback by Bad Philosophy – Corrupted People – Undermind The Constitution « ELECTRIC CAVES – A HISTORY OF ILLUSION | March 15, 2011 | Reply

  23. [...] was a Constitution which ordained and established a Federation of States which united only for THE LIMITED PURPOSES enumerated in the Constitution: national defense, international commerce & relations; and [...]

    Pingback by Hour of the Time » Veritas News Service – 03/14/11 – Progressive Education and Bad Philosophy | March 14, 2011 | Reply

  24. [...] was a Constitution which ordained and established a Federation of States which united only for THE LIMITED PURPOSES enumerated in the Constitution: national defense, international commerce & relations; and [...]

    Pingback by How Progressive Education and Bad Philosophy Corrupted The People & Undermined The Constitution of The United States « A Nation Beguiled | March 11, 2011 | Reply

  25. [...] was a Constitution which ordained and established a Federation of States which united only for THE LIMITED PURPOSES enumerated in the Constitution: national defense, international commerce & relations; and [...]

    Pingback by How Progressive Education and Bad Philosophy Corrupted The People & Undermined The Constitution of The United States | March 11, 2011 | Reply

  26. [...] was a Constitution which ordained and established a Federation of States which united only for THE LIMITED PURPOSES enumerated in the Constitution: national defense, international commerce & relations; and [...]

    Pingback by How Progressive Education and Bad Philosophy Corrupted The People & Undermined The Constitution of The United States « Publius-Huldah's Blog | March 6, 2011 | Reply

  27. [...] need to be a constitutional lawyer to understand it. It was written by Publius Huldah and can be found on her blog.  I have re-published it below with her permission. A Primer in Constitutional [...]

    Pingback by A Primer in Constitutional Law | February 5, 2011 | Reply

  28. Hello,

    This is a inquiry for the webmaster/admin here at publiushuldah.wordpress.com.

    May I use part of the information from this blog post right above if I provide a backlink back to your website?

    Thanks,
    Oliver

    Comment by bidou.ca | November 10, 2010 | Reply

    • You certainly may!

      Comment by Publius/Huldah | November 11, 2010 | Reply

  29. [...] are vested in Congress (Art I, §1).  This means that no other branch may make law.  Since the legislative powers of Congress are enumerated, Congress may make laws only on those specific subjects listed in the Constitution as proper [...]

    Pingback by THE LIE OF "SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE": HOW THE SUPREME COURT UNLAWFULLY SILENCED CHRISTIANS | October 29, 2010 | Reply

  30. [...] Congress’ powers are also enumerated! Congress has constitutional authority over international commerce and war. Domestically, it has [...]

    Pingback by Do Supreme Court Judges Obey The Constitution? « www.offmyfrontporch.com | August 18, 2010 | Reply

  31. [...] We have Our sacred Constitution.  The most important concepts for you to learn are these:  (1) ENUMERATED POWERS (2) Why neither the “GENERAL WELFARE“, the INTERSTATE COMMERCE nor the “NECESSARY & [...]

    Pingback by 912 Roll-Call’s General Blog » Blog Archive » What Should States Do When the Federal Government Usurps Power? | July 9, 2010 | Reply

    • PH,
      I have learned a tremendous amount from your penned conversations here, but I still have so much more to learn. I will concentrate on the two subjects you’ve mentioned and do my best to focus. I will return here more often to see what else I can learn. Thank you for your knowledge.

      Comment by Richard | October 26, 2010 | Reply

      • You are most welcome, dear!

        Comment by Publius/Huldah | October 26, 2010 | Reply

  32. Although the essay brought up many good points concerning enumerated powers, please considet the following. The ill-conceived 17th Amendment, the amendment that gives citizens the power to vote for federal senators, also needs to be consider with respect to corrupt Congress overstepping is constitutional limits.

    To begin with, given that the Founder’s reserved the lion’s share of government power to serve the people to the states, not the Oval Office and Congress, Justice Marshall had established the following case precedent, now wrongly ignored by both federal and state lawmakers. Justice Marshall wrote that Congress cannot lay taxes in the name of state power issues.

    “Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” –Chief Justice Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824. …

    So not only is Obamacare, for example, constitutionally unauthorized as evidenced by the Constitution’s silence about healthcare, but based on Justice Marshall’s official words, Congress never had the power to lay taxes to fund Obamacare.

    Next, some taxpayers don’t like the idea of not being able to vote for federal Senators because they want to have representation for their taxes. But such taxpayers evidently don’t understand the following. Only the House of Representatives, for which the Founders gave voters at large the power to elect, has the power to initiate legislation which raises revenue.

    Article I, Section 7, Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

    So taxpayers are not giving up representation for their taxes if they cannot vote for federal senators.

    The bottom line is that if the 17th A. had not been ratified, then federal senators who answer to state lawmakers would probably have killed legislation by FDR and Obama which not only wrongly usurped unique state powers, but also robs state taxes associated with those unique powers as Justice Marshall had indicated. So taxpayers don’t understand that the federal Senators that they elect end up working for the federal government, not the people, and are partly to blame for infamous, illegal federal income taxes. (Are you listening bankrupt California?)

    Taxpayers need to remedy this situation by doing the following. Given that state lawmakers, not Congress, have the power to amend the Constitution, taxpayers need to replace Constitution-impaired incumbents in the state legislatures with pro-constitutional process lawmakers in November as much as they need to replace the pirates now running DC (both Democratic and Republican) with pro-constitutional process lawmakers.

    Then pro-constitutional process lawmakers in both federal and state governments can used their legislative votes to destroy the phony powers of the Oval Office and Congress, putting a PERMANENT stop to illegal federal taxes by ultimately repealing the 17th Amendment.

    Comment by B. Johnson | June 28, 2010 | Reply

    • Thank you, B. Johnson, for your comment. You are quite right about the 17th Amendment. I mentioned it in this paper which is on my blog: “Term Limits: Treating the Symptom, not the Disease.” The key Federalist Paper on why State Legislatures should select US Senators is Federalist No. 62. In the 6th para, Madison explains how this would protect against BAD LAWS being made in Congress. The Representatives were to represent The People. The Senators were to represent The States. The President was to protect The Constitution and serve as the CINC.

      So, is there a cure for the stupidity of the American people? Can we educate them?

      Comment by Publius/Huldah | June 29, 2010 | Reply

    • Fantastic piece, Publius; and great follow up on the 17 amendment, B Johnson.

      Comment by dbonner | October 17, 2010 | Reply

  33. [...] When Congress makes laws which are not within its enumerated powers, such pretended laws are mere acts of usurpation and have “supremacy” over [...]

    Pingback by The Arizona Illegal Alien Law And The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution: | June 10, 2010 | Reply

  34. [...] When Congress makes laws which are not within its enumerated powers, such pretended laws are mere acts of usurpation and have “supremacy” over [...]

    Pingback by The Arizona Immigration Law And The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution | Vote Democratic Party | June 6, 2010 | Reply

  35. [...] When Congress makes laws which are not within its enumerated powers, such pretended laws are mere acts of usurpation and have “supremacy” over [...]

    Pingback by They must do it, or be overrun | The American Jingoist | June 5, 2010 | Reply

  36. [...] When Congress makes laws which are not within its enumerated powers, such pretended laws are mere acts of usurpation and have “supremacy” over [...]

    Pingback by American States Reign Control Over General Government In Washington D.C. « Political Vel Craft | June 4, 2010 | Reply

  37. [...] powers, such pretended laws are mere acts of usurpation and have “supremacy” over nothing. http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/congress-enumerated-powers/ b) Second, note that Art. VI, clause 2 also shows that only laws of States which are Contrary to [...]

    Pingback by Arizona Law Stands the test of the Constitution « Stop The Invasion of the US! | June 4, 2010 | Reply

  38. [...] at: http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/congress-enumerated-powers/ Social Bookmarking Posted on: 23rd of March 2010 in Civil Liberty, Ethics, Government Waste, [...]

    Pingback by CONGRESS’ ENUMERATED POWERS | Lux Libertas - Light and Liberty | March 23, 2010 | Reply

  39. Publius:
    You and I have conversed in the past politely and with learning on my part.
    I think the one thing I have learned from you is that whatever it says in the Constitution has not made a real difference over the past 200 years. If we are to restore Consitutional authority, then we need to change the judges who sit on all Federal benches and at the Supreme Court. Because of precedent due to past case work it will take an activist court(s) to alter the course of our country. Conservative jusdges do not like to be activist.
    Our only hope is to assure appointment of conservatively activist judges. That means conservatives have to control governorships, state legislatures, then gain control of Congressional seats and Senate seats.

    Tell me I am wrong and how we can influence this process.
    Thanks for your time.

    Comment by Bill Person | March 21, 2010 | Reply

    • I remember you well, friend! The federal judges are only a symptom of the real problem. The REAL problem is the American people who elected the presidents who nominated, and the Senators who confirmed, the federal judges!

      The American People are ignorant of our Constitution. They know nothing of our history. Far too many have embraced the mindset that the federal government should, “take it from somebody else and give it to me!”. Look at the ads on TV! People bragging about how they get their diabetes supplies, etc., for free! That is the normalization of moral corruption. The legalization of envy & theft. “I need it; therefore, YOU must pay for it.”

      And what have the pastors been doing while envy & theft became institutionalized into law? Sitting around talking about how they are too good for this world and that their place is in Heaven.

      So! We must educate the People. I teach the people I can reach. But we must spread out. We don’t need a majority – we just need enough. Conservatives must get involved in local party politics. Do what you are doing. Help teach the Constitution. Talk about “enumerated powers”. Let’s make that a household term!

      We can turn this around. But we all have to work work work! Hugs, PH

      Comment by Publius/Huldah | March 22, 2010 | Reply

  40. Mr. Publius, thank you so much for the time and energy you have put into all this information. You have answered my questions and then some. God bless you for all you are doing to help us. Now I wish I had gone into Constitutional Law more than the Medical Field. The Healthcare Bill just passed 221 to 201. Our Nation is divided sad to say. Our job is to Unite this Nation. If this law is not Constitutionally sound then we have a chance. Our God teaches us that His people suffer for lack of Knowledge. Knowledge gives us power. Thank you again and keep up the good work. …. Be Blessed …. Veronica

    Comment by Veronica | March 21, 2010 | Reply

    • We need people in the medical field! Though I understand that about 1/3 of them will be closing up shop. Atlas Shruggs – can’t say I blame them. We have no right to make slaves of those in the medical profession. PS: I’m a girl!!!! Well….old lady, then.

      Comment by Publius/Huldah | March 21, 2010 | Reply

  41. AS much as I appreciate the technical conversation about the intent of the constitution, what our founders did not foresee was a world were perceptions are managed and designed to lead people to desired impressions and expectations, as we have in our world of modern product marketing. Even our 4th estate has turned to creating news, creating perceptions in order to influence repeat purchase, instead of being the journalistic antagonists that they should be.
    We elect people because we trust their descission making. Sadly I think it is a fault of being a human being to want to abdicate our responsibilities because we have to spin our wheels to make a living. We want to believe the pols will make the right decission on our behlaf. For most this is the easiest way to move on to the next day. The challenge going forward is making sure people actually learn what the documents really mean. Fortunatley, thank to Al gore who invented the internet, we have this wonderful tool that is changing communications, that allow people to participate with the touch of an “enter” button and finally can put the truth in front of them 24/7. Social internet groups allow information to go viral in an instant. It is therefore most important that what is presented can be supported with fact otherwise readers will be turned off.
    The question is, is it possible to undo all of the perceptions that our pols have created regarding the consitutinality of their actions and votes?

    Comment by Bill Person | February 10, 2010 | Reply

    • In a word, Yes it is possible, and in fact we MUST. We have the opportunity every 2 years to throw out politicians that violate the Constitution, they however will NEVER be rid of US, We the People.

      We can win this simply in a war of attrition, if no other way.

      The principles of freedom are enshrined in the heart of everyone God created. We need to and are awakening this in many who know this instinctively, but were not consciously aware of how we have been enslaved.

      I’m encouraged by the many now saying, NO MORE, and that number is growing rapidly.

      Comment by William | October 17, 2010 | Reply

  42. First of all, I want to let you know that I think your efforts are a godsend to us who thirst for tools to fight back at the destruction of our way of life. At first I really appreciated Rush Limbaugh views, but he just talks.
    At any rate, I googled “Baylor College of Law curriculum” to see if they taught constitutional law. They do offer the course in the sophmore year, but only that one course. There are not even any electives offered. Out of curiosity, I clicked on the course for more clarity and nowhere in there is “general welfare”, “interstate commerce”, or “necessary and proper” clauses singled out. And more importantly, I saw absolutely no reference to the Federalist Papers which would provide clarity of the framer’s thoughts. Baylor of one of the premier law colleges in Texas and only minimally teaches the constitution and unless you are in the classroom, there is no guarantee that what they are teaching is correct. Best regards for you and your efforts. I hope you continue the fight for education of everyone on this matter and I will continue to learn, learn, learn so I can stand eyeball to eyeball with my rep, Joe Barton, and pin his ass to the wall,………. nicely of course.

    Bob Hilliard

    Comment by Bob Hilliard | January 7, 2010 | Reply

    • “Fashionable thinking” changes in law schools. Some 40 years ago, the law schools taught that the “general welfare” & “interstate commerce” clauses permit Congress to make just about any law they want. And if you listen to the older idiots in Congress, you will note that they babble incoherently about those two clauses.

      Apparently, the new fad is the 14th Amendment: That is what the supreme court has been using to “discover” all kinds of “constitutional rights” to engage in practices – such as killing babies – which were previously deemed criminal. See my paper on the Enumerated Powers of the Federal Courts. It seems that federal constitutional law classes of today focus on 14th amendment cases.

      I don’t recall “The Federalist Papers” ever being mentioned in my law school. We did NOT read the U.S. Constitution. I expect most lawyers have never read it. We were told that the supreme court decides what it means, so we were taught to look only to supreme court decisions. (See, e.g., my comments about Megyn Kelly in the paper on whether the interstate commerce clause authorizes Congress to force us to buy health insurance. She would research supreme court opinions to find the answer!

      Comment by Publius/Huldah | January 7, 2010 | Reply

  43. [...] December 22, 2009 Here’s a great article from a newly made friend that lives in Tennessee and is a retired Constitutional lawyer of 35+ years Publius Huldah. She has several articles I will probably post in their entirety a little at a time for education purposes. You can check them all out at  her website Publius Huldah.WordPress.com [...]

    Pingback by Refuting the Bad “Health Insurance vs Auto Insurance” Analogy: A Lesson In Federalism « www.offmyfrontporch.com | December 22, 2009 | Reply

  44. It seems it doesn’t and hasn’t mattered what the constitution or bill of rights says or what the founders intended. Not since WWI it seems.
    It is rex lex not lex rex for the political aristocracy that runs our country. Satan uses them as cats paws for his purposes.
    As George Orwell pointed out in his political parable, Animal House, some animals..ie the political class and its favoured groups are more equal than others.
    Hence their hostility to documents or people who would tend to limit their options..like the Bible, the Bill of Rights, the Constitutional, or even G-d. Or even reason.
    Keep up the good work in educating, it may be to late, but still it would still be good to know what we’ve lost, and perhaps educating the public will cause some to realise the filmsy legal construction the ursupation of this once great republic rests upon.
    We still elect our tyrants for now.

    Comment by mike kalaher | December 19, 2009 | Reply

  45. [...] I, Sec. 8, U.S. Constitution, shows that the enumerated powers delegated to the “federal” government are confined to war, a few aspects of commerce [...]

    Pingback by Refuting The Bad "Health Insurance - Auto Insurance" Analogy: | December 19, 2009 | Reply

  46. [...] not give a general grant of legislative authority to Congress! Rather, ours is a Constitution of enumerated powers only. If a power isn’t specifically granted to Congress in The Constitution, Congress doesn’t [...]

    Pingback by The U.S. Constitution Does “NOT” Authorize Congress To Force Americans To Buy Health Insurance « www.offmyfrontporch.com | December 18, 2009 | Reply

  47. [...] not give a general grant of legislative authority to Congress! Rather, ours is a Constitution of enumerated powers only. If a power isn’t specifically granted to Congress in The Constitution, Congress [...]

    Pingback by DOES THE "GENERAL WELFARE" CLAUSE OF THE U.S CONSTITUTION AUTHORIZE CONGRESS ... | October 28, 2009 | Reply

  48. [...] not give a general grant of legislative authority to Congress! Rather, ours is a Constitution of Father of The Constitution, and Alexander Hamilton, author of most of The Federalist Papers, expressly [...]

    Pingback by Does the U.S. Constitution authorize congress to force Americans to buy health insurance? | Lux Libertas - Light and Liberty | October 24, 2009 | Reply

  49. [...] an addition “from which no apprehensions are entertained”. Ours is a Constitution of enumerated powers [...]

    Pingback by DOES THE "INTERSTATE COMMERCE" CLAUSE AUTHORIZE CONGRESS TO FORCE US TO BUY HEALTH INSURANCE? | October 9, 2009 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 570 other followers

%d bloggers like this: