Publius-Huldah's Blog

Understanding the Constitution

CONGRESS’ ENUMERATED POWERS

By Publius Huldah

1.  With the U.S. Constitution, We The People created the federal government.  It is our “creature”, and has no powers other than those We delegated to it in Our Constitution.

Webster’s American Dictionary of the English Language (1828), says re “constitution”:

“…In free states, the constitution is paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature, limiting and controlling its power; and in the United States, the legislature is created, and its powers designated, by the constitution.” [boldface mine]

If  you, dear Reader, will study this paper and read the Constitution, you will know more about it than most State & federal judges, most law professors & lawyers, those who spout off on TV & radio, just about anybody in Congress, and the self-educated who fixate on their own idiotic theories.  And you will certainly know more than anyone currently occupying any office in the executive branch of the federal government.

2. The federal government 1 has three branches: Article I of the Constitution creates the Legislative Branch (Congress) & lists its powers; Article II creates the Executive Branch & lists its powers (President); and Article III creates the Judicial Branch (federal courts) & lists its powers.

In this paper, we will consider only the enumerated powers of Congress. But the powers of the other two branches are likewise strictly limited and enumerated.

3. Congress is NOT authorized to pass any law on any subject just because a majority in Congress think the law is a good idea!  Instead, the areas in which Congress is authorized to act are strictly limited and defined (“enumerated”).

WE delegated to Congress the following Enumerated Powers over the Country at Large:

Article I, § 8, clauses 1-16 delegate to Congress the powers:

(1) To lay certain taxes;

(2) To pay the debts of the United States;

(3) To declare war and make rules of warfare, to raise and support armies and a navy and to make rules governing the military forces; to call forth the militia for certain purposes, and to make rules governing the militia;

(4) To regulate commerce with foreign Nations, and among the States, and with the Indian Tribes;

(5) To establish uniform Rules of Naturalization;

(6) To establish uniform Laws on Bankruptcies;

(7) To coin money and regulate the value thereof;

(8) To fix the standard of Weights and Measures;

(9) To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting;

(10) To establish post offices and post roads;

(11) To issue patents and copyrights;

(12) To create courts inferior to the supreme court; and

(13) To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the Laws of Nations.

Other provisions of Our Constitution delegate to Congress powers over the Country at Large to make laws regarding:

(14) An enumeration of the population for purposes of apportionment of Representatives and direct taxes (Art. I, § 2, cl. 3);

(15) Elections of Senators & Representatives (Art. I, §4, cl. 1) and their pay (Art. I, § 6);

(16) After 1808, to prohibit importation of slaves (Art. I, § 9, cl. 1); 2

(17) After 1808, to restrict migration (immigration) to these United States (Art. I, §9, cl. 1);

(18) A restricted power to suspend Writs of Habeas Corpus (Art. I, §9, cl. 2);

(19) To revise and control imposts or duties on imports or exports which may be laid by States (Art. I, § 10, cl. 2 &3)

(20) A restricted power to declare the punishment of Treason (Art. III, §3, cl. 2);

(21) Implementation of the Full Faith and Credit clause (Art. IV, §1); and,

(22) Procedures for amendments to The Constitution (Art. V).

The 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 19th, 23rd,  24th, & 26th Amendments delegated additional powers to Congress over the Country at Large respecting certain civil rights & certain voting rights, the public debt [lawfully incurred], income tax, successions to vacated offices, dates of assembly, and appointment of representatives from the D.C.

So!  In a nutshell, the powers WE delegated to Congress over the Country at Large fall into four categories:

♠ International relations, commerce and war;

♠ Control immigration by restricting who may come to these United States, and establish a uniform rule of naturalization of new citizens;

♠ Domestically, to establish a uniform commercial system: weights & measures, patents & copyrights, a monetary system based on gold & silver, bankruptcy law, a [limited] power over interstate commerce, and mail delivery.

♠And in some of the Amendments, to protect certain civil and certain voting rights.

That’s it!  All other powers are retained by the States or the People.

Federal Enclaves & Territories:

4. Two provisions of Our Constitution grant to Congress broad legislative powers over these two categories of specifically defined geographical areas:

a)  Federal Enclaves: Article I, §8, next to last clause, grants to Congress “exclusive Legislation” over the following geographically tiny areas:  the seat of the government of the United States (not to exceed 10 square miles), forts, arsenals, dock-yards, and the like. As James Madison said in Federalist No. 43 at 2., it is necessary for the government of the United States to have “complete authority” at the seat of government, and over forts, magazines, etc. established by the federal government.

b)  Territories: Article IV, §3, cl. 2 grants to Congress power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other property belonging to the United States (as opposed to property belonging to individual states).  As these territories became States, Congress’ powers under this Article were terminated.

Congress may not lawfully exercise ANY other powers!

5. Thus, Congress has NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to bail out financial institutions, businesses, and homeowners who don’t pay their mortgages; NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to take control of our health care; NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to pass laws denying secret ballots to employees who are solicited for membership by labor unions; NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to take away your IRA’s and other retirement accounts, NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to take your guns, NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to pass laws respecting energy consumption or “emissions”, education, housing, etc., etc., etc.

Therefore, all laws which Congress has made on such topics are unconstitutional as outside the scope of the legislative powers WE delegated to Congress in OUR Constitution. WE THE PEOPLE did not give such powers to Congress when we ordained and established the Constitution, created the Congress, and listed its 22 enumerated powers over the Country at large. And WE did not delegate those powers to Congress in any of the Amendments.

6. You ask, “How can Congress make all these laws if they are unconstitutional?

Congress gets away with it because WE are ignorant of what our Constitution says; and We have been indoctrinated into believing that Congress can do whatever they want!

Consider Prohibition:  Up to 1919, everyone still understood that The Constitution did not give Congress authority to simply “pass a law” banning alcoholic beverages!  So the Constitution was amended to prohibit alcoholic beverages, and to authorize Congress to make laws to enforce the prohibition (18th Amdt.).

But after the Progressives took over the federal government during the early 1900s, the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. The Progressives are the ones who imposed the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, and benefits some people [e.g., welfare parasites, labor unions & obama donors] at the expense of others.

The Progressives claimed the power to determine what is in the “public interest” and have the federal government implement their notions of what advances the “public interest”.

Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; but would follow the “will of the people” as expressed by their representatives in the federal government.  In other words, the Progressives gave the federal government a blank check to fill out anyway they want.

During the regime of Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), all three branches of the federal government abandoned the Constitution: FDR proposed “New Deal” programs; Congress passed them. At first, the Supreme Court ruled (generally 5 to 4) that these programs were unconstitutional as outside the legislative powers delegated to Congress. But when FDR threatened to “pack the court” by adding judges who would do his bidding, one judge flipped to the liberal/progressive side, and the Court started approving FDR’s programs (5 to 4).

7. Since then, law schools don’t teach the Constitution. Instead, they teach decisions of the FDR-dominated supreme Court which purport to explain why Congress has the power to regulate anything it pleases. The law schools thus produced generations of constitutionally illiterate lawyers and judges who have been wrongly taught that three clauses, the “general welfare” clause, the “interstate commerce” clause and the “necessary & proper” clause, permit Congress to do whatever it wants!

8. “Well”, you ask, “what aboutthe general welfare clause’?  Doesn’t that give Congress power to pass any law on any subject as long as it is for the ‘general Welfare of the United States’ “?  NO, IT DOES NOT!

First, you must learn what “welfare” meant when the Constitution was ratified:  “Welfare” as used in the Preamble & in Art. 1, §8, cl. 1, U.S. Constitution, meant

“Exemption from any unusual evil or calamity; the enjoyment of peace and prosperity, or the ordinary blessings of society and civil government” (Webster’s, 1828).

But The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (1969), added a new meaning: “Public relief – on welfare.  Dependent on public relief”.  Do you see how our Constitution is perverted when new meanings are substituted for original meanings?

Second, James Madison addresses this precise issue in Federalist No. 41 (last 4 paras):  Madison points out that the first paragraph of Art. I, §8 employs “general terms” which are “immediately” followed by the “enumeration of particular powers” which “explain and qualify”, by a “recital of particulars”, the general terms.   So, yes!  The powers of Congress really are restricted to those listed herein above.

OUR FOUNDERS UNDERSTOOD that the “general Welfare”, i.e., the enjoyment of peace & prosperity, and the enjoyment of the ordinary blessings of society & civil government, was possible only with a civil government which was strictly limited & restricted in what it was given power to do!

9. “OK”, you say, “but what aboutthe commerce clause’ (Art. I, §8, cl. 3)?  Doesn’t that give Congress power to pass laws on any subject which ‘affects’ ‘interstate commerce’ “?  NO, IT DOES NOT! In Federalist No. 22 (4th para) and Federalist No. 42 (11th &12th paras), Alexander Hamilton & James Madison explain the purpose of the “interstate commerce” clause:  It is to prohibit the States from imposing tolls and tariffs on articles of import and export – merchandize – as they are transported through the States for purposes of buying and selling. That’s what it does, Folks; and until the mid-1930’s and FDR’s “New Deal”, this was widely understood. 3

10. “Well, then”, you say, “doesn’t the ‘necessary & proper’ clause’  [“elastic clause”  or “sweeping clause” ] (Art. I, §8, last clause) allow Congress to make any laws which the people in Congress think are ‘necessary & proper’?” NO, IT DOES NOT!  Alexander Hamilton says the clause merely gives to Congress a power to pass all laws necessary & proper to execute its declared powers (Federalist No. 29, 4th para); a power to do something must be a power to pass all laws necessary & proper for the execution of that power (Federalist No. 33, 4th para); “the constitutional operation of the intended government would be precisely the same if [this clause] were entirely obliterated as if [it] were repeated in every article” (Federalist No. 33, 2nd para); and thus the clause is “perfectly harmless”, a tautology or redundancy. (Federalist No. 33, 4th para).  James Madison agrees with Hamilton’s explanation. (Federalist No. 44, 10th-17th paras). In other words, the clause simply permits the execution of powers already declared and granted. Hamilton & Madison are clear that no additional substantive powers are granted by this clause.

11. The 10th Amendment states:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

So!  If a power is not delegated by Our Constitution to the federal government; and if the States are not prohibited (as by Art. I, § 10) from exercising that power; then that power is retained by the States or by The People.  And WE are The People”!

12. Our Framers insisted repeatedly that Congress is restricted to its enumerated powers.  James Madison says in Federalist No. 45 (9th para):

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.  The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.  The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people…” [emphasis mine]

In Federalist No. 39 (14th para):

“…the proposed government cannot be deemed a national one; since its jurisdiction extends to certain enumerated objects only, and leaves to the several States a residuary and inviolable sovereignity over all other objects.”

and in Federalist No. 14 (8th para):

“…the general [federal] government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects…”  [emphasis mine]

13. In all its recent legislation, Congress ratchets up its concerted pattern of lawless usurpations.  The executive branch and the federal courts approve it.  Such is the essence of tyranny.  They are “ruling” without our consent, and hence the federal government is now illegitimate. PH

Endnotes:

1 “Federal” refers to the form of government:  An alliance of States associated in a “federation” with a national government to which is delegated supremacy over the States in specifically defined areas ONLY.

2 Some object that our Constitution endorsed slavery. During the 18th century, slavery was universal. But Article I, § 9, clause 1, is our Proclamation to the World that WE would abolish the slave trade!  James Madison wanted the “barbarism” & “unnatural traffic” of the slave trade abolished immediately (Federalist Paper No. 42, 6th para).

3 See Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in United States v. Lopez (1995).  Justice Thomas’ opinion shows why those disposed to usurp attack him so virulently.

Revised July 1, 2009; Sep 8, 2009; Oct. 17, 2010; Jan 3, 2013; Feb. 4, 2013

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to Google BookmarkAdd to MySpaceAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Twitter

September 8, 2009 - Posted by | Elastic clause, Enumerated Powers of Congress, General Welfare Clause, Interstate Commerce Clause, Necessary and Proper clause, sweeping clause | , , , , ,

160 Comments »

  1. […] Here’s more if want it. Scroll down to No. 10: […]

    Like

    Pingback by The Constitutional Minute #12 The Necessary and Proper Clause perversion | campconstitution.net | November 25, 2022 | Reply

  2. When it says… (1) To lay certain taxes; … exactly what are these taxes? What are they for? Do you have an article on this?

    Like

    Comment by Blake | December 14, 2020 | Reply

  3. […] Congress’ Enumerated Powers are listed and explained here. […]

    Like

    Pingback by Thorner/Huldah: It’s True: The Bible is our Constitution’s Foundation | Nancy J. Thorner | June 5, 2019 | Reply

  4. Hello. I recently found your web site and have been reading voraciously everything I can find. Thank you so much for making many topics so clear.
    In reading, one thing I don’t see mentioned is Freedom of Speech issues. According to what I’ve read so far, it seems to me the SC didn’t have the authority to limit free speech in Schenck v. United States.
    More recently, I’ve seen calls for Congress to pass laws regarding free speech access due to censorship on media platforms. For example: https://humanevents.com/2019/05/03/platform-access-is-a-civil-right/
    I am wondering what your thoughts on the matter are.

    Like

    Comment by Robert | May 29, 2019 | Reply

  5. […] of the federal government by making lawful what is now unconstitutional because it is not an “enumerated power.” Others put a band-aid on a problem without solving the problem. The amendments pertaining to […]

    Like

    Pingback by MARK LEVIN REFUTED – Speak Up America | March 1, 2019 | Reply

  6. […] 1.  Should we support this?  Let’s think it through:  Ours is a Constitution of “enumerated powers” only.  See “Congress’ Enumerated Powers”. […]

    Like

    Pingback by The Proposed “28th Amendment”: Another Terrible Idea « Publius-Huldah's Blog | January 13, 2018 | Reply

  7. […] clauses, a quick look into The Federalist Papers reveals the original intent. I illustrate that here and […]

    Like

    Pingback by Article V Convention: How “Individuals of Insidious Views” Are Stealing Our Constitution  | Topcat1957's Blog | February 22, 2017 | Reply

  8. […] Congress’ Enumerated Powers are listed and explained here. […]

    Like

    Pingback by The Biblical Foundation of Our Constitution. | let the facts be submitted | February 20, 2017 | Reply

  9. […] Levin and others who support an Article V Convention nevertheless insist that such a remedy is provided for by Article V of the Constitution and that amending the Constitution is the only way to deal with a federal government which consistently ignores and tramples over the Constitution.  This is not so, because Levin’s amendment remedy, instead of fixing government, actually guts the Constitution by increasing the powers of the federal government by making lawful what is no… […]

    Like

    Pingback by Thorner: Mark Levin’s case for an Article V Convention challenged | Nancy J. Thorner | October 22, 2016 | Reply

  10. […] 4This paper lists all the powers delegated to Congress by our Constitution. You can learn them!  […]

    Like

    Pingback by Arizona Balanced Budget Amendment | Grumpy Opinions | August 23, 2015 | Reply

  11. […] the enumerated powers delegated to Congress & to the President.  With our Votes & Nullification of unconstitutional acts, let’s […]

    Like

    Pingback by We Don’t Need an Article V Convention to “Clarify” Our Constitution! | Grumpy Opinions | August 23, 2015 | Reply

  12. What are obamadonors? Please explain so i can come to a conclusion based on correct definitions. Thank you.

    Like

    Comment by Yvonne Davis | August 6, 2015 | Reply

    • An “obama donor” would be someone who donated to obama’s campaigns. Sorry I wasn’t clear.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | August 6, 2015 | Reply

  13. […] of the federal government by making lawful what is now unconstitutional because it is not an “enumerated power.” Others put a band-aid on a problem without solving the problem. The amendments pertaining to […]

    Like

    Pingback by Mark Levin Refuted | Exposing Modern Mugwumps | July 15, 2015 | Reply

  14. […] of the federal government by making lawful what is now unconstitutional because it is not an “enumerated power”. Others put a band-aid on a problem without solving the problem. The amendments pertaining to […]

    Like

    Pingback by | Mark Levin Refuted: Keep the Feds in Check with Nullification, not Amendments ! | April 26, 2015 | Reply

  15. This is a marvelous essay! Thank you, Publius Huldah, for writing this!

    Like

    Comment by T. Kay | February 10, 2015 | Reply

  16. […] This paper lists all the powers delegated to Congress by our Constitution. You can learn […]

    Like

    Pingback by Balancing the Budget? Or Adding A National Sales Tax To The Income Tax? - Sons of Liberty Media | October 18, 2014 | Reply

  17. […] was a Constitution which ordained and established a Federation of States which united only for THE LIMITED PURPOSES enumerated in the Constitution: national defense, international commerce & relations; and […]

    Like

    Pingback by How Progressive Education and Bad Philosophy Corrupted The People & Undermined The Constitution of The United States - Sons of Liberty Media | September 14, 2014 | Reply

  18. […] These enumerated powers are the only areas where the federal government has lawful authority over The States and The People in The States. In all other matters [except those listed at Art. I, §10]the States and The People retain supremacy, independence, and sovereignty. Go here for a complete list of all of Congress’ Enumerated Powers. […]

    Like

    Pingback by The Taxing Clause, Five Lawless Judges, And Obamacare - Sons of Liberty Media | September 5, 2014 | Reply

  19. […] […]

    Like

    Pingback by Anonymous | August 30, 2014 | Reply

  20. […] Congress’ enumerated powers [Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 1-16 is not the complete list] […]

    Like

    Pingback by The Balance of Powers Act - People Are Destroyed For Lack Of Knowledge - Sons of Liberty Media | August 30, 2014 | Reply

  21. […] See: Congress’ Enumerated Powers, the President’s Enumerated Powers, & the Enumerated Powers of the Federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by Parental Rights Amendment: Congressmen Are Selling You and Your Kids Out to Big Government - Sons of Liberty Media | August 19, 2014 | Reply

  22. […] or eliminate existing income tax exemptions, deductions, or credits by a simple majority vote. 4. This paper lists all the powers delegated to Congress by our Constitution. You can learn […]

    Like

    Pingback by Balanced Budget Amendment? Or Adding a National Sales Tax to the Income Tax? | Paradshift.net | August 18, 2014 | Reply

  23. […] the progressive agenda. They don’t know that Our Constitution created a Congress with limited and enumerated powers.  They don’t know that the President’s powers are “carefully limited; both in … extent and […]

    Like

    Pingback by Why Republican Politicians Sell Us Out. « Publius-Huldah's Blog | June 14, 2014 | Reply

  24. […] clauses, a quick look into The Federalist Papers reveals the original intent.  I illustrate that here and […]

    Like

    Pingback by Article V Convention: How “Individuals of Insidious Views” Are Stealing Our Constitution « Publius-Huldah's Blog | February 27, 2014 | Reply

  25. […] This paper lists all the powers delegated to Congress by our Constitution.  You can learn […]

    Like

    Pingback by Balancing the Budget? Or Adding A National Sales Tax To The Income Tax? « Publius-Huldah's Blog | February 10, 2014 | Reply

  26. […] Huldah is the author of the above. Read her list of Congress’s Enumerated Powers here and All You Need to Know About Impeachment […]

    Like

    Pingback by Compact for America and Arizona’s Balanced Budget Amendment – A National Sales Tax? | Maggie's Notebook | January 31, 2014 | Reply

  27. […] This paper lists all the powers delegated to Congress by our Constitution.  You can learn […]

    Like

    Pingback by Publius Huldah: Exposes BBA - Adding A National Sales Tax To The Income Tax? | USA NEWS FIRST | January 31, 2014 | Reply

  28. […] proper” clauses, a quick look into The Federalist Papers usually reveals the original intent.  I illustrate that here and in many other […]

    Like

    Pingback by Propaganda And The Conspiracy against Our Constitution « Publius-Huldah's Blog | January 28, 2014 | Reply

  29. […] and proper” clauses, a quick look into The Federalist Papers usually reveals the original intent. I illustrate that here and in many other […]

    Like

    Pingback by Bridge for sale…cheap! | Scanned Retina Resource | January 25, 2014 | Reply

  30. […] their jobs so much simpler if they did, and their approval rating would sky rocket!  They have enumerated powers, a limit on what they are allowed to do, yet we allow them to go merrily on their way, doing […]

    Like

    Pingback by Read The Damn Bills!! , An Ol' Broad's Ramblings | January 10, 2014 | Reply

  31. […] (Federalist No. 16, next to last para) didn’t trouble ourselves to learn the enumerated powers of Congress and the President.  Do you know […]

    Like

    Pingback by The “Convention of States” Scam, the War over the Constitution, and how the States Sold the Reserved Powers to the Feds. « Publius-Huldah's Blog | December 18, 2013 | Reply

  32. […] of the federal government by making lawful what is now unconstitutional because it is not an ‘enumerated power.’  Others put a band-aid on a problem without solving the […]

    Like

    Pingback by The Article V Convention Debate | Order of the Ephors – Can the Republic be saved? | September 22, 2013 | Reply

  33. […] of the federal government by making lawful what is now unconstitutional because it is not an “enumerated power”. Others put a band-aid on a problem without solving the problem. The amendments pertaining to […]

    Like

    Pingback by Publius Huldah refutes Mark Levin’s Article V Convention: Do you know the Constitution well enough yourself to understand why a Constitutional Convention is dangerous to our Republic? | September 16, 2013 | Reply

  34. […] of the federal government by making lawful what is now unconstitutional because it is not an “enumerated power”. Others put a band-aid on a problem without solving the problem. The amendments pertaining to […]

    Like

    Pingback by Constitutional Convention: Mark Levin Refuted | American Clarion | September 16, 2013 | Reply

  35. […] of the federal government by making lawful what is now unconstitutional because it is not an “enumerated power”. Others put a band-aid on a problem without solving the problem. The amendments pertaining to […]

    Like

    Pingback by Publius Huldah Refutes Mark Levin; Says Keep the Feds in Check with Nullification, not Amendments! | USA NEWS FIRST | September 15, 2013 | Reply

  36. […] of the federal government by making lawful what is now unconstitutional because it is not an “enumerated power”. Others put a band-aid on a problem without solving the problem. The amendments pertaining to […]

    Like

    Pingback by Mark Levin Refuted: Keep the Feds in Check with Nullification, not Amendments! « Publius-Huldah's Blog | September 15, 2013 | Reply

  37. […] federal Constitution secures our God given rights by strictly limiting the powers of Congress, the powers of the President, and the powers of the federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by Publius Huldah: Parental Rights - God-given and Unalienable? Or Government-granted and Revocable? | USA NEWS FIRST | July 30, 2013 | Reply

  38. […] federal Constitution secures our God given rights by strictly limiting the powers of Congress, the powers of the President, and the powers of the federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by Parental Rights: God-given and Unalienable? Or Government-granted and Revocable? « Publius-Huldah's Blog | July 28, 2013 | Reply

  39. […] Congress has limited powers.  Turning criminals into non-criminals, with the stroke of a pen, is NOT ONE OF THEM!  The administration, and I’m not talking about just the Obama administration…I’m including previous ones as well, have over stepped their bounds on a regular basis.  Either the legislative branch leads the executive branch around by the nose, or visa versa.  Either way, we have created a monster by our lack of attention.  What we have created is a body of anti-Constitutional criminals.  This has been a danger for our once great Republic.  And an FYI, the Supreme Court does NOT have the final say…in ANYTHING!  Nor does any other federal court! […]

    Like

    Pingback by A Nation Of Laws? , An Ol' Broad's Ramblings | July 23, 2013 | Reply

  40. […] 2. See: Congress’ Enumerated Powers, the President’s Enumerated Powers, & the Enumerated Powers of the Federal Courts. […]

    Like

    Pingback by PARENTAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT: SELLING YOU , YOUR KIDS OUT TO BIG GOVERNMENT | Rowan TEA Party Patriots | July 18, 2013 | Reply

  41. […] 2 See: Congress’ Enumerated Powers, the President’s Enumerated Powers, & the Enumerated Powers of the Federal Courts. […]

    Like

    Pingback by Parental Rights Amendment: Congressmen Are Selling You and Your Kids Out to Big Government | Give Me Liberty | July 12, 2013 | Reply

  42. […] See:  Congress’ Enumerated Powers, the President’s Enumerated Powers, & the Enumerated Powers of the Federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by Parental Rights Amendment: Selling You and Your Kids Out to Big Government « Publius-Huldah's Blog | July 11, 2013 | Reply

  43. […] See: Congress’ Enumerated Powers, the President’s Enumerated Powers, & the Enumerated Powers of the Federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by Parental Rights Amendment: Selling You and Your Kids Out to Big Government | Unified Patriots | July 8, 2013 | Reply

  44. […] See:  Congress’ Enumerated Powers, the President’s Enumerated Powers, & the Enumerated Powers of the Federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by Parental Rights Amendment: Selling You and Your Kids Out to Big Government | American Clarion | July 8, 2013 | Reply

  45. […] 2 See:  Congress’ Enumerated Powers, the President’s Enumerated Powers, & the Enumerated Powers of the Federal Courts. […]

    Like

    Pingback by Parental Rights Amendment: Selling You and Your Kids Out to Big Government | Grumpy Opinions | July 8, 2013 | Reply

  46. […] and Medicare, a MASSIVE drain on the country as a whole.  If you want more information on the Enumerated Powers of Congress, I suggest you read, links and all, P/H’s […]

    Like

    Pingback by Our “Fair Share” , An Ol' Broad's Ramblings | April 15, 2013 | Reply


Leave a comment