PH’s Article V Convention & Nullification Events in Kentucky & North Carolina

I will speak on the deadly danger of an Article V convention, and of the two remedies our Framers actually told us to use when the federal government usurps power, at the following events:

Date: Thursday, March 19, 2015 in Union, Kentucky.
Host: John Birch Society – Kentucky
Location: Triple Crown Country Club, 1 Triple Crown Blvd, Union, KY 41091
Time: Noon to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
This is a lunch event – lunch is $16.00

Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 in Greensboro, North Carolina.
Host: Conservatives for Guilford County (C4GC)
Location: The Oakbranch Conference Center, 23 Oak Branch Drive, Greensboro, NC 27407
Time: 6:30 – 8:30 p.m., Eastern Time.

See flyer here: https://www.facebook.com/conservatives4gc/photos/gm.342448609282620/10152684533065373/?type=1&theater

Date: Saturday, March 28, 2015 in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Host: The Rightful Remedy Conference
Location: University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, Fretwell Building, Room 100
Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time

On internet: http://rightfulremedyconference.com/

On face Book: https://www.facebook.com/events/386914354780520/

Love to see you at any of these events! And if you can’t come, please forward to your contacts in these areas.

March 15, 2015 - Posted by Publius Huldah | Uncategorized | Article V, Article V Convention, constitutional convention, Convention of States project, Federal Convention of 1787, James Madison, Mark Levin, Nullification, nullification by States, re-writing the Constitution, Tenth Amendment

29 Comments »

So voting for Constitutional Amendments constitutes a Constitutional Convention, is that what you’re asserting?

LikeLike

Comment by Rob John | March 16, 2015 | Reply
- Did you really not understand what I wrote? Really?
  
  LikeLike
  
  Comment by Publius Huldah | March 16, 2015 | Reply
  - I understand facts, I also understand your affiliation with George Soros.
    
    LikeLike
    
    Comment by Rob John | March 19, 2015 | Reply
    - Well, why hasn’t he sent me any checks?
      
      seriously, you are an idiot. Now I know you are a “true believer” [see Eric Hoffer] and not a COS operative.
      
      LikeLike
      
      Comment by Publius Huldah | March 19, 2015 | Reply
      - Truth set free is like a lion!
        See you again in May.
        Godspeed
        
        LikeLike
        
        Comment by imtryingwolfy | March 20, 2015 | Reply
        
        That’s Great! Thank you!
        
        LikeLike
        
        Comment by Publius Huldah | March 20, 2015 | Reply
Dear PH, Thank You for your E-mail and all the work that You do. I will not be able to attend. I live in Chuck Schumer Territory. Yikes! Coca Cola had a con con once. Remember when they changed “Classic Coke” to the “New Coke.” How did that work out? The only difference, “Coca Cola” realized their mistake, corrected it, and went back to the original/intent recipe. Unfortunately if we change our recipe/Constitution, we will not have a chance to go back.

Unrelated. Natural Born Citizen. I have been reading books, books via Librovox in search for that priceless pearl. I found this book. I posted the links on Birther Report. Not much of response. Is this book a big deal? I think it is. Librovox ~ “The John Adams Library…” This book:John Adams Library A Brief Exposition of The Constitution of the United States: With An Appendix, Containing The Declaration Of Independence And The Articles Of Confederation, And A Copious Index. By James Bayarad Philadelphia: Hogan & Thompson, 1391/2 Market Street. 1833. A brief exposition of the Constitution of the U…

The Executive. Pgs. 95 – 96. “It is not necessary that a man should be born in this country, to be ” a natural born citizen.” It is only requisite he should be a citizen by birth, and that is the case with all the children of citizens who have ever resided in this country, though born in a foreign country.” ~ James Bayard – pg. 96.

A brief exposition of the Constitution of the U…

Author ~ James Asheton Bayard, Jr., (1799 – 1880) BAYARD, James Asheton, Jr. – Biographical Information

John Adams Library ~ 3,183 texts The John Adams Library at the Boston Public Library : Free Books : Free Texts : Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

Top tool bar ~ scroll mouse over the third “?” to the left of “sign in” rt. upper corner for “search.” Type in name/subject etc. Ex. John Jay and press the “enter” key on your key board. See: Internet Archive Search: John Jay

Take care. Sincerely Eileen

LikeLike

Comment by Merry Christmas | March 16, 2015 | Reply
- Thank you, Eileen for the link. I will book mark it for study and citing. Please send me the hyperlink!
  
  I have ALWAYS pointed out that in order to be an NBC, one need not be born in this Country – location of birth is irrelevant. The relevant facts are the citizenship of one’s parents. If they are citizens, their baby – who succeeds to the condition of his parents – is “born” a citizen. This is what Vattel clearly stated and I pointed out in my paper on this topic.
  
  But the ignoramuses out there who insist that one must be born in this Country in order to be an NBC! It is immoral to pontificate on matters of which one is ignorant.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Comment by Publius Huldah | March 16, 2015 | Reply
  - Dear PH Here is the Hyperlink
    
    “A Brief Exposition of The Constitution of the United States: …”
    by James Bayarad ~ Philadelphia, 1833.
    
    The Executive ~ Pgs. 95 – 96.
    
    “It is not necessary that a man should be born in this country, to be ” a natural born citizen.” It is only requisite he should be a citizen by birth, and that is the case with all the children of citizens who have ever resided in this country, though born in a foreign country.” ~ James Bayard – pg. 96.
    
    https://archive.org/stream/briefexpositiono01baya#page/94/mode/2up
    
    BAYARD
    
    http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=b000248
    
    LikeLike
    
    Comment by Merry Christmas | March 19, 2015 | Reply
    - Related ~ What Countrymen meant in the old classical sense ~ Prof. Brad Brizer
      
      “The Meaning of Liberty During the American Founding”
      Professor Brad Brizer ~ March 22, 2011
      Video + Audio mp3 Link.
      **Audio mp3 link has better sound quality**.
      
      http://fee.org/library/detail/the-meaning-of-liberty-during-the-american-founding
      
      mp3 link:
      
      [audio src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/fee/audio/seminars/HL/Brad%20Birzer%20-%20The%20Meaning%20of%20Liberty%20During%20the%20American%20Founding.mp3" /]
      
      mp3 link @ 54:39 ~ My Fellow Countrymen ~ Footnote ~ “Countrymen is capital “C,”… what country means in the old classical sense, is not nation or soil. Country meant that grouping of all men and women of good will. That’s what countrymen meant. It did not matter, it did not matter on what continent you were… “Cato” you have a roman soul…” Brad Brizer
      
      LikeLike
      
      Comment by Merry Christmas | March 19, 2015 | Reply
      - Sorry about that. The mp3 audio hyperlink can be found above video.
        
        LikeLike
        
        Comment by Merry Christmas | March 19, 2015 | Reply
      - James Wilson, Lectures on Law ~ Part 1
        Chapter VII ~ Of Man, as a Member of Society
        Towards the end of chapter ~ The sentiments of Mr. Locke
        
        Excerpt:
        
        The sentiments of Mr. Locke on this subject go much further. “’Tis plain,” says he,q “by the law of right reason, that a child is born a subject of no country or government. He is under his father’s tuition and authority, till he comes to the age of discretion; and then he is a freeman, at liberty what government he will put himself under; what body politick he will unite himself to.”
        
        http://www.nlnrac.org/american/scottish-enlightenment/primary-source-documents/lectures-on-law
        
        LikeLike
        
        Comment by Merry Christmas | March 19, 2015 | Reply
    - And that is why Citizen Parents regardless of where they live must…
      
      https://americansabroad.org/issues/taxation/us-taxes-while-living-abroad-faq/
      
      LikeLike
      
      Comment by Merry Christmas | March 25, 2015 | Reply
- Hi there- I live in Chuck Schumer country too! Just wanted you to know there are a few of us who still ardently follow the Constitution! PH is the best!
  
  LikeLike
  
  Comment by PatriciaDance | March 25, 2015 | Reply
You are a busy lady. I am glad there is sufficient interest to hear your message. If not for Ed Wood introducing me to you I would still be in the wilderness and believing Levin. If you ever have some “down time” around Cookeville please let me know. I appreciate what you are doing. John Mullins

LikeLike

Comment by John Mullins | March 15, 2015 | Reply
- Thank you, John! I expect things to slow down end of next month – then we should all get together –
  
  LikeLike
  
  Comment by Publius Huldah | March 15, 2015 | Reply
I hope you have great turnouts Publius Huldah!

LikeLike

Comment by PatriciaDance | March 15, 2015 | Reply
More disinformation madam? Being a ideologue serves no one but yourself.

LikeLike

Comment by Rob John | March 15, 2015 | Reply
- That was fast! I just posted the notice and you comment right away.
  
  “Disinformation”? Really? Where? List the “disinformation”, and then prove that what I said is wrong.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Comment by Publius Huldah | March 15, 2015 | Reply
  - I have to admit, the proponents of a Constitutional Convention are giving the democrats a good run for their money in the baseless accusation dept.
    
    Just finished looking at the books Rob John likes to read according to his Gravatar Bio. If we are to take him at his word, then he is quite familiar with our founding documents and philosophy in general. Strange that someone as learned as he would offer such tripe…
    
    I was going to suggest that the fine people of Kentucky drag their two U.S. Senators to hear you speak, but I highly doubt their problem is with learning.
    
    Rand Paul supports the BBA! Set them straight PH!
    
    LikeLike
    
    Comment by Blue Tail Gadfly | March 15, 2015 | Reply
    - Yes, I always wondered what people saw in Rand Paul – he seems to me to be the typical gutless unprincipled and ignorant RINO – who supports a BBA and a convention and who never read the Declaration and Constitution.
      
      I don’t know anything about Rob John but do know that many people claim to have read works that they never read or didn’t understand – judging from what they say about them. Also, when dealing with people who spout COS talking points, one never knows whether one is dealing with operatives who know what they are doing or with the “true believers” (the ones Eric Hoffer wrote about) – or as Nietzsche called them, “resentful squint-eyed souls”.
      
      LikeLike
      
      Comment by Publius Huldah | March 15, 2015 | Reply
    - No one has proposed a constitutional convention.
      
      LikeLike
      
      Comment by Rob John | March 16, 2015 | Reply
      - Are you arguing that the only convention authorized in the United States Constitution is not constitutional?
        
        In one sense you are correct. Considering that a Convention of the States is made up, no one is PROPOSING a Constitutional Convention. Yet a Constitutional Convention is what we will get.
        
        Smacks of Orwellian double-speak to me.
        
        LikeLike
        
        Comment by Blue Tail Gadfly | March 16, 2015 | Reply
GOD Willing, I’ll be at the Greensboro Event.

LikeLike

Comment by Noah | March 15, 2015 | Reply
- Wow! That will be great, dear Friend!
  
  LikeLike
  
  Comment by Publius Huldah | March 15, 2015 | Reply
Dear, dear Publius, So nice to have you back. I thought those(left) for Con-Con had gotten rid of you as they had many others in the past. Please always send me your material, I do treasure it. Ron Evans

LikeLike

Comment by Ron Evans | March 15, 2015 | Reply
- I’m not easy to get rid of – thou the COS operatives and true believers do try – just sent to trash a nastygram from “Rob John”.
  
  On 2nd thought – I’ll untrash Rob John’s nastygram….
  
  LikeLike
  
  Comment by Publius Huldah | March 15, 2015 | Reply
  - Publius they’re a little testy because of the misinformation being lapped up. The premise here is that someone is calling for a Constitutional Convention when no such thing has occurred. I’d love to know who. Maybe I wouldn’t be so testy. Straw men, you know?
    
    LikeLike
    
    Comment by Rob John | March 16, 2015 | Reply
    - Are you unaware:
      
      1. That there is only one convention for “proposing amendments” – the one provided by Article V?
      2. Throughout the past decades, it has been called by different names: An Article V convention, a constitutional convention, a con con. But it’s all the same convention – no matter what you call it.
      3. In a speech Rob Natelson gave on Sept. 16, 2010, he announced that he would no longer call what he wanted a “constitutional convention” – henceforth, he would call it, among other things, a “convention of states”.
      
      Here is his speech: see top of 2nd page: http://constitution.i2i.org/files/2012/01/STATE-APP-CONVENTION-METHOD-CooleyLR.pdf
      
      Confess! You fell for a marketing gimmick!
      
      And the only misinformation being put out is put out by those pushing for a convention: All their claims are demonstrably false.
      
      LikeLike
      
      Comment by Publius Huldah | March 16, 2015 | Reply