Publius-Huldah's Blog

Understanding the Constitution

Treason, Cowardice, and the Islamic Invasion: Why States Must Revitalize The Militia

By Publius Huldah

To All State Governors and State Legislators:

War is coming to America. Obama is importing young able-bodied males to make civilizational jihad on us; and Congress can’t summon up the moral courage to stop him.

To see what is ahead for us, watch this 20 minute video. It depicts the Islamic takeover which is right now going on throughout Europe as European countries are being repopulated by millions of young able-bodied Muslim males (euphemistically called “refugees”) who are explicit about their intention to breed the native Europeans out of existence, and replace the European cultures with Islamic culture.

And Obama is bringing it here.

This paper discusses the two courses of action set forth in Federalist Paper No. 46 for situations such as this: (1) The States must refuse to cooperate with the federal government; but if that doesn’t solve the problem, (2) The States must use their State Militia to defend their State and Citizens.

Invaders are not “Refugees” or “Immigrants”

Those pushing for an Islamic takeover of Europe and North America are referring to these able-bodied young Muslim males as “refugees”. The use of that term brings the Muslims who are brought into the United States within the federal Refugee Resettlement Act. And since the Constitution delegates power over immigration to Congress, and Congress re-delegated refugee policy to the President, the States must submit to Obama’s Will and accept the “refugees” he forces on them. Thus goes the specious argument recently made by Ian Millhiser.

But we will look at the Truth.

What does our Constitution say about Immigration and Naturalization?

Immigration (or migration) pertains to new people coming to this Country to live.1 Naturalization refers to the process by which an immigrant becomes a Citizen.

Our Constitution does delegate power over immigration and naturalization to Congress. Article I, §9, clause 1, delegates to Congress (commencing January 1808) power to control migration. 2 Article I, §8, clause 4, delegates to Congress power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.

But what is going on now with the importation of large numbers of able-bodied young Muslim males is not “immigration” as contemplated by our Constitution. It is an act of war being committed against the People of the United States by their President. The plan is to overthrow our Constitutional Republic and set up an Islamic Caliphate over America. 3

That is Treason – it is Insurrection. It is not “immigration”, and it is not “refugee resettlement”.

The States must refuse to cooperate

Michael Boldin’s recent informative article explains how the federal resettlement program works: The federal government coordinates resettlement of “refugees” with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) located within the States, and thus circumvents state and local governments. Accordingly, the States should promptly stop all such NGO involvement; take control of the programs themselves; and then refuse to cooperate with the federal government.

James Madison, Father of our Constitution, spells this out in Federalist No. 46 (7th para). Respecting unpopular acts of the federal government:

“…the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps, refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union; the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassments created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, difficulties not to be despised; would form, in a large State, very serious impediments; and where the sentiments of several adjoining States happened to be in unison, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.” [emphasis mine]

But if the federal government persists, then the States must move to the next Step.

Our Constitution Imposes the Duty on the Federal Government to protect us from Invasion

Article IV, §4, requires The United States to protect each of the States against Invasion:

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion…” [emphasis mine]

In Federalist No. 43 (3rd para under 6.), Madison says of this provision:

“A protection against invasion is due from every society to the parts composing it…” [emphasis mine]

Article I, §8, clause 15 delegates to Congress the power:

“to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

Article 1, §8, clause 16 delegates to Congress the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia. The States retain the power to appoint the Officers and conduct the training.

Article II, §2, clause 1 makes the President Commander in Chief of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States. [But remember: the federal government may call forth the Militia only for the three purposes listed in Art. I, §8, cl. 15].

But the federal government hasn’t called forth the Militia to protect the States from the Islamic invasion. To the contrary, the President is importing the invaders and foisting them on the States.

So! What are States and The People to do? Because the President is aligned with the invaders, and Congress filled with moral cowards, must we passively submit to having ourselves and our Christian and Jewish children killed, and then let our surviving burka dressed daughters and granddaughters be handed over to the clitoris cutters?

No! The People have the Natural Right of self-defense; and the States have the reserved Power to defend their Citizens. With the State Militia, The People and the States have the means to exercise this Natural Right and reserved Power.

The States must Revitalize their State Militia

What is the Militia? As Dr. Edwin Vieira’s excellent series 4 on the Militia and how it guarantees the right to keep and bear arms shows, the Militia has a long history in America. That history began with the English settlements in the early 1600s. Every free male was expected to be armed and prepared at all times to protect himself, his family, and his community. Laws in the Colonies gave effect to this requirement. So at the time of the drafting of our Constitution in 1787, everyone knew of this 150 year long history of free American males being required to be armed, trained, and ready at a moment’s notice to answer the call of Duty.

Accordingly, the above identified “militia clauses” were written into our Constitution of 1787.

In 1792, Congress implemented these militia clauses and passed “An Act more effectually to provide for the National Defense by establishing an Uniform Militia throughout the United States”. This Act required all able-bodied male citizens (with a few exceptions) between the ages of 18 and 45 to get a rifle, bayonet, ammunition and an ammunition pouch, and enroll in the local Unit of their State Militia for training.

As Section 1 of the Act shows, the adult able-bodied male Citizens of a State are The Members of their State Militia. So, continuing the long-standing colonial tradition, Members of Congress in 1792 thought it such a fine idea that all male citizens be armed and trained and members of their State Militia, they required it by federal law!

So! As Art. I, §8, cl. 15 shows, Congress is authorized to provide for calling the Militia into national service to “execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”. But what if the federal government refuses to act?

Alexander Hamilton provides the answer in Federalist No. 29. Hamilton shows that one of the purposes of the Militia is to protect the Citizens of the States from threats to their liberties posed by the federal government (7th & 12th paras); and that the States’ reservation of power to appoint the Officers secures to them an influence over the Militia greater than that of the federal government (9th para).

And on the use of the Militia to repel Invasions, Hamilton says (13th para):

“In times of insurrection, or invasion, it would be natural and proper that the militia of a neighboring State should be marched into another, to resist a common enemy, or to guard the republic against the violence of faction or sedition…”

True, it was contemplated that the “United States” would be the entity which protects the States against Invasion (Art. IV, §4). But when the federal government has demonstrated its determination that the States ARE TO BE OVERRUN BY INVADERS, then the People have the natural right to defend themselves, and their States have the retained Power to employ the Militia to defend them from those into whose hands the federal government has demonstrated its determination to deliver them.

The States are within their retained Sovereign Power to call up their State Militia to fend off invaders. Article I, §10, last clause, is an expression of this retained sovereign Power of States of self-Defense:

“No State shall … engage in War, unless actually invaded…”

Clearly, the States may use their State Militia to engage in War to defend the States from Invasion.5

James Madison spoke to the same effect as Hamilton respecting federal tyranny. In Federalist No. 46 (9th para), Madison speaks of a federal government so consumed with madness that it sends its regular army against the States:

“…Let a regular army … be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. … [To the regular army] would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. … Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms [an insurmountable] barrier against the enterprises of ambition…” [boldface mine]

Look to Your State Constitution for Provisions re Your State Militia

Article VIII of the Constitution for the State of Tennessee provides for Tennessee’s Militia. Consistent with the tradition which has existed in this Country since the early 1600s, all Tennessee Citizens are members of this Militia. Article I, §28, TN Constitution says:

“That no citizen of the state shall be compelled to bear arms, provided he will pay an equivalent, to be ascertained by law.”

Read your State Constitution. What does it say about the Militia? What do the implementing State Statutes say? Is your State Militia active? Why not? For information on revitalizing your State Militia, see Dr. Vieira’s three part series, “Are You Doing Your Constitutional Duty For “Homeland Security”?


Madison closes his magnificent 9th paragraph in Federalist No. 46 with this:

“…Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors. Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it.” [emphasis mine]

But we became “debased subjects of arbitrary power”. So now, will we lay down before the Invaders and Insurrectionists and those in our federal government who aid and abet them? Or we will man up, revitalize our State Militia, and show the world that we still have some “free and gallant Citizens of America” in this land?


1 Our Framers contemplated that immigration would be restricted to people who shared our culture and values – e.g., Federalist No. 2, 5th para.

But Americans got conned into believing that an ideal culture is multicultural. Thus, with Teddy Kennedy’s immigration reform act of 1965, our borders were opened to all. We congratulated ourselves on our new virtues of “tolerance” and “diversity”. But the goal of the multiculturalists was to eradicate our unique Culture – we were too gullible to see it. So now, the enemy is inside the gates, and more are coming in. And Islam doesn’t tolerate multiculturalism.

2 “Open borders” adherents bristle at the assertion that Congress has constitutional authority to restrict immigration. They insist that Art. I, §9, cl. 1 addresses only the importation of slaves and says nothing about free immigrants. But the text distinguishes between “migrations” and “importations”, and the Duty is levied on “importations”, not “migrations”. Slaves, being “property”, were “imported”. Free Europeans “migrated”. The power of the States to determine such persons as it was proper to admit, expired January 1808. There are various letters and speeches from our early days confirming this. I’ll write it up when I get time (if this doesn’t turn on the light). For now, see Federalist No. 42 (6th para):

“…Attempts have been made to pervert this clause [Art. I, §9, cl. 1] into an objection against the Constitution, by representing it on one side as a criminal toleration of an illicit practice [the slave trade], and on another as calculated to prevent voluntary and beneficial emigrations from Europe to America. I mention these misconstructions, not with a view to give them an answer, for they deserve none, but as specimens of the manner and spirit in which some have thought fit to conduct their opposition to the proposed government.” [boldface mine]

Our Framers understood that the national government must be able to determine who is allowed to come here. That’s why Art. I, §9, cl. 1 delegates to Congress power to control immigration, commencing January 1808. And isn’t one of your complaints against the federal government that it has refused for so long to control our Borders?

3 See the website for The Center for Security Policy (Frank J. Gaffney) HERE. There you can read The Plan of the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate and take over all American Institutions. They are working to make this Country part of a global Islamic caliphate. Open your eyes NOW.

4 Do read all 8 of Dr. Vieira’s papers in this series. They get very moving.

5 “Troops” as in Art. I, §10, last clause, are professional full-time soldiers. States may not keep “Troops” absent consent of Congress. But the States’ Militia is a permanent State institution. The States retain their pre-constitutional powers over their Militia, subject only to the federal government’s limited supremacy set forth in the 3 Militia clauses [See Part 2 of Dr. Vieira’s paper HERE.] PH

December 2, 2015

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to Google BookmarkAdd to MySpaceAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Twitter

December 2, 2015 - Posted by | armed citizens, Federalist Paper No. 46, gun control, James Madison, Militia, refugee resettlement | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. Like

    Comment by Mickey White (@whitemcky) | September 6, 2020 | Reply

  2. The video is private. how do i view it?


    Comment by Bob | September 22, 2016 | Reply

    • You tube keeps taking it down b/c they don’t want people to see it. Let me see if I can find another edition which is still available.
      check your inbox I sent you an email.


      Comment by Publius Huldah | September 22, 2016 | Reply

  3. Since this post deals with Treason, among other topics, I am posting a news article that appears Barry Soetoro, aka Obama has committed treason by colluding with BLM “leaders” to plot to disrupt BOTH conventions so Obama can declare Martial Law.

    Does this not rise tot he level of Treason given it is a plot to overthrow the rule of law by causing anarchy?


    Comment by Mike Travis | July 19, 2016 | Reply

    • “treason against the United States” is Barry’s middle name. I marvel that so many Americans were taken in by this guy. Including my own family members – thou I expect they didn’t look further than thinking how cool it is to vote for the black guy. And “everyone” said how brilliant he is. And since we now believe whatever we are told, it worked.


      Comment by Publius Huldah | July 19, 2016 | Reply

  4. North Carolina had a State Militia until it was disbanded after there was a single Workman’s Compensation claim back about 1996. Our state law prohibits “private militias” which I take to mean militias not authorized by the state.

    But given that the Constitution gives the state the duty to have a militia, don’t the people retain the right to form a militia anyway? We retain our right to defend ourselves whether our government performs its duty or not. Am I right?


    Comment by topcat1957 | March 25, 2016 | Reply

  5. Reblogged this on WatchmanMomma and commented:
    But we became “debased subjects of arbitrary power”. So now, will we lay down before the Invaders and Insurrectionists and those in our federal government who aid and abet them? Or we will man up, revitalize our State Militia, and show the world that we still have some “free and gallant Citizens of America” in this land?


    Comment by WatchmanMomma | February 16, 2016 | Reply

  6. The 20 minute video referenced at the beginning of this article has been blocked on YouTube. Does anyone know where there is another site showing this video? It is not that important of course, we have all seen report after report of the Muslim invasion on Europe. We know the nature of Islam and we know the intentions of the Muslim invaders.
    But I would like to see this video which PH thinks a good one.


    Comment by topcat1957 | February 15, 2016 | Reply

    • BLAST THOSE ACCURSED PEOPLE WHO BLOCKED IT! They did it before, but it was resurrected – I linked to a resurrected site. I knew I should have gotten someone to “embed” or whatever they do to save videos – but I was soo busy. Those muslim men are saying exactly what they plan on doing.
      If you can find it – please save it somehow – and let me know.

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by Publius Huldah | February 15, 2016 | Reply

      • I will see if I can find a good one on this subject, i.e. Muslim colonists invading Europe openly revealing their intention to replace every government there with Islamic governments, replace laws with Sharia based legal system, and replace the culture with Sharia dictated culture. Population jihad.

        We know from the history of other countries which offered humanitarian relief to Muslim refugees how the process works. Lebanon gave refuge to Muslims who were thrown out of Jordan. The refugees happily accepted help from Lebanese families, living with them, eating with them, behaving as grateful friends to their hosts. However as soon as the population of Lebanon became a majority Muslim country, they turned on their hosts. The survivor of one family told what happened. The Christian family members pleaded, asking why after they had given them shelter, food, friendship they would kill them now? The very same Muslims who had accepted help from this family explained that ‘yes, you fed us and sheltered us. But you are kuffars, therefore you must die.” Brigitte Gabriel tells this story.

        There is an Islamic doctrine called taqiyya which means in so many words that Muslims may deceive non muslims in order to advance the cause of Islam; to protect Muslims in foreign lands until they have a position of power and can dominate non muslims.

        The nature of Islam is War.

        “It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its laws on all nations and to extend its power to the entire world.”~Hassan al Banna~Founder Muslim Brotherhood

        The Muslims coming here now are not refugees; they are colonists. They are attempting to build up their numbers, stockpile weapons, infiltrate our governments and intelligence agencies, law enforcement organizations, etc. until they reach a critical mass. They are not fleeing oppression and they are not here to assimilate.
        In certain communities such as Deerborn MI the Muslims make up a local majority and we see the same sort of lawlessness, and disregard for Americans and our culture.
        At the same time, Obama is trying to disarm the American people.
        Of course, I know I am preaching to the choir on this website and to all the readers here.


        Comment by topcat1957 | February 15, 2016 | Reply

        • I have seen Brigette Gabriel – wish all would – her testimony is moving. Let me know when you find the or a video which reveals the intentions – they intend to breed the western European cultures out of existence.


          Comment by Publius Huldah | February 15, 2016 | Reply

  7. You stated that, “Our Constitution does delegate power over immigration and naturalization to Congress. Article I, §9, clause 1, delegates to Congress (commencing January 1808) power to control migration”. Actually, Article 1, Section 1 states, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives”. Article 1, Section 1 only states what constitutes Congress and that legislative powers belong to them. Nothing about immigration at all. Immigration is not even addressed in the U.S. Constitution (only naturalization), therefore it is a state issue under the 9th and 10th Amendments.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by Amy | December 26, 2015 | Reply

  8. Just made a comment but don’t know what happened to it?

    Anyway, how’s that “fundamental transformation” going everyone?

    Ain’t it great.

    Just wait, it’s gonna get even “better” soon.


    Comment by Diamondback | December 24, 2015 | Reply

    • ummm, I was eating dinner and then combing my cat for fleas. I actually do have a life beyond writing about the Constitution!


      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 24, 2015 | Reply

    • Sorry, didn’t realize you censored comments before posting.

      I realize you have a life other than this and won’t bother you any further in the future.

      Merry Christmas.


      Comment by Diamondback | December 25, 2015 | Reply

      • Good gracious! You are sensitive!

        Of course I monitor comments to my site! People post vile stuff.

        Liked by 1 person

        Comment by Publius Huldah | December 25, 2015 | Reply

  9. Merry Christmas all!

    Publius, where do you think the County Sheriffs might fit into all of this? I agree that were I Governor of one of the affected states, I’d immediately call up the militia IF there was one. Do any of the states still have militias other than the general “armed populace”?

    I’m thinking the Sheriff of each county might be able to call forth a Posse and all those posses combined could then be the states militia?

    The feds and states have been intentionally destroying the “militia” for decades you know.

    Now they want our arms of military utility.

    After effectively neutering our LE resources across the country and the stirring up of unrest by Obama’s former community agitator orgs combining into the BLM mobs and now bringing in mostly military aged male muslims …

    Yes, I’d call that treason.

    Yet the sheeple yawn.


    Comment by Diamondback | December 24, 2015 | Reply

    • If The State Legislatures and State Governors don’t man up and revitalize their State Militia, then the only thing standing in the way of War Lords all over the Country is our County Sheriffs. Sheriff Mack is right – our Sheriffs are our last hope.
      Americans must pay more attention to the elections for County Sheriff – that and the State Legislatures.
      Problem is: as long as Americans remain ignorant about our Declaration of Independence and Constitution – they have no measuring rod by which to judge candidates for office.

      Liked by 2 people

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 24, 2015 | Reply

  10. I’m not particularly a Trump fan but the argument against his ban on Muslim immigration has one weakness. Islam is not just a religion, it also is a political system. It needs to be treated as a political system, as well. Perhaps, a new category combining a religion as well as a political system.


    Comment by Victor Landry | December 13, 2015 | Reply

    • Why do you assume that Trump doesn’t also understand the true nature of islam? I expect you & I are not the only wise persons on Earth!


      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 13, 2015 | Reply

      • It seems, to me, that Islam contains the worst charteristics of both a religion and a political system.

        Liked by 1 person

        Comment by Victor Landry | December 13, 2015 | Reply

        • Well, as far as institutionalized evil is concerned, islam is right up there with communism & fascism. The distinguishing characteristic of islam is, I think, its perversion of Old Testament law.
          And communism and fascism deify their “leaders”.

          Liked by 1 person

          Comment by Publius Huldah | December 14, 2015 | Reply

  11. PH, I know that immigration/naturalization falls within the Enumerated Powers, thus with Congress. So I guess that power has been transferred to the executive via laws passed. Now it doesn’t seem that Congress has the authority to transfer responsibility that was given specifically to them. Am I wrong? And how do they get back what is theirs if they need the president’s signature to change the previous laws?

    Thanks, Larry


    Comment by llotter2013 | December 8, 2015 | Reply

    • Pursuant to Art. I, Sec. 8, clause 4 and Art. I, Sec. 9, clause 1, CONGRESS is delegated power to determine who can become a naturalized citizen and the procedures for naturalization; and CONGRESS decides who is permitted to come here to live. The policy making in these areas is delegated to CONGRESS alone.
      The President’s job is to follow the instructions CONGRESS gives.
      CONGRESS may not lawfully re-delegate these powers to the President.

      CONGRESS doesn’t need the President’s approval or signature to take back power which is delegated to CONGRESS alone! CONGRESS should man up and TAKE the power back. If the President gives them trouble, they should impeach him and kick him out of the White House. And since he is probably an Indonesian national, they should then deport him to Indonesia.

      Liked by 2 people

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 8, 2015 | Reply

  12. At this time, it looks as though Donald Trump is the only person who is willing to put a stop to this immigration mess. I believe he will build the wall and secure it. There will only have to be a few shot dead to make believers that we are serious abou protecting this country


    Comment by PAUL OWENS | December 4, 2015 | Reply

    • Well, none of the others will. Under the North American Union, the borders between the US and Mexico and the US and Canada are all but erased…..


      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 4, 2015 | Reply

      • Is the NAU a legal thing? How can it be constitutional?


        Comment by topcat1957 | February 15, 2016 | Reply

        • Do read the Task Force Report on the NAU at the CFR website. I’ve read it – it’s big print and wide margins so doesn’t take long. (I printed it out.) The CFR website tells how the NAU came about: During 2005, George W. Bush met at his ranch in Texas with the PM of Canada and the President of Mexico. They hammered out the outlines of the NAU. Then the CFR set up a Task Force to flesh out the discussions by the 3 men.

          It’s not “constitutional”! THAT’S WHY NEED NEED A CONVENTION! THEY NEED A NEW CONSTITUTION FOR US – AND FOR MEXICO [does Canada have a written Constitution? England doesn’t] to transform us from a sovereign nation to a member state of the NAU.

          Treason – Insurrection – it’s all there. And investment banker Heidi Cruz was on the Task Force to flesh out the plan ……

          Liked by 1 person

          Comment by Publius Huldah | February 15, 2016 | Reply

  13. Reblogged this on The zombie apocalypse survival homestead and commented:
    Bottom line!


    Comment by mobiuswolf | December 4, 2015 | Reply

  14. is there a way for me to share these on my facebook page?   chas brothers   From: Publius-Huldah’s Blog To: Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 9:35 AM Subject: [New post] Treason, Cowardice, and the Islamic Invasion: Why States Must Revitalize The Militia #yiv3682137581 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv3682137581 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv3682137581 a.yiv3682137581primaryactionlink:link, #yiv3682137581 a.yiv3682137581primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv3682137581 a.yiv3682137581primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv3682137581 a.yiv3682137581primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv3682137581 | Publius Huldah posted: “By Publius HuldahTo All State Governors and State Legislators:War is coming to America. Obama is importing young able-bodied males to make civilizational jihad on us; and Congress can’t summon up the moral courage to stop him.To see what is ah” | |


    Comment by chas.brothers | December 2, 2015 | Reply

    • Sure, underneath the article are the share codes – the “f” for facebook is there. Feel free to share!


      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 2, 2015 | Reply

  15. Excellent, excellent paper as always. This is The True Citizen’s Constitutional Militia. An affirmation of The Second Amendment plus TheTenth Amendment.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by Noah Tickle | December 2, 2015 | Reply

    • Thanks, Noah. Yes, it is the Constitutional Militia. Our State governors and State legislatures must get to work and revitalize their State Militia!


      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 2, 2015 | Reply

  16. Dear Mam, the right letters CONgress is what is happening here. CON gress has duped “US” We the People. The con has been going on for a long time. I will be walking 2,678 miles starting in January from Seal Beach California to the The Vietnam Wall and the Reflecting Pool in Washington D. C. My purpose is to bring attention to our inept government, and try and help Veterans along the way. You can go to if you find the time.


    Comment by Paul j | December 2, 2015 | Reply

    • Well, Paul, but if The People had a working knowledge of our Constitution, politicians would not be able to dupe them. It is b/c Americans have NO IDEA what our Constitution says that they are so easily deceived. It will be very cold walking from California to Washington, D.C. during the Winter. Take care. Be wise.

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 2, 2015 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: