Publius-Huldah's Blog

Understanding the Constitution

Balanced Budget Amendment: The Solution? Or Deathblow?

By Publius Huldah

The Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) Made Simple

Say you want your Butler to buy some groceries; so you give him your credit card. You can:

1.  Give him an ENUMERATED LIST of what you want him to buy: 1 chicken, 5# of apples, two heads of cabbage, a 2# sack of brown rice, and a dozen eggs. Whatever amount he spends for these enumerated items will be charged to you.

2.  Tell him he may spend on whatever he wants, and ask him to please don’t spend more than 18% of your weekly income. But whatever amount he decides to spend (on pork and other things) will be charged to you.

The first illustrates how our Constitution is written: The items on which Congress is authorized to spend money are listed – enumerated – in the Constitution. To see the list, go HERE.

The second illustrates how a balanced budget amendment (BBA) works: It creates a completely new constitutional authority to spend on whatever the federal government wants to spend money on. And there is no enforceable limit on the amount of spending.

Our Constitution Limits Spending to the Enumerated Powers

Our Constitution doesn’t permit the federal government to spend money on whatever they want. If Congress obeyed our Constitution, they would limit spending to the enumerated powers listed in the Constitution. Since the Constitution delegates to Congress only limited and narrowly defined authority to spend money, excessive federal spending is not the result of a defective Constitution, but of disregarding the existing constitutional limitations on federal spending.

Because we have long ignored these existing limitations, we now have a national debt of some $20 trillion plus a hundred or so trillion in unfunded liabilities. 1

Various factions are now telling conservatives that the only way to stop out of control federal spending is with a BBA.

Obviously, that is not true. The constitutional answer is to downsize the federal government to its enumerated powers. Eliminate federal departments (Education, Energy, Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency, Housing and Urban Development, etc., etc., etc.), for which there is no constitutional authority. 2

Since our Constitution delegates only a handful of powers to the federal government, most of what they’ve spent money on since the early 1900s is unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated.

Yet our Constitution is still legally in place; and can be dusted off, read, and enforced by a Repentant People. They can shrink the federal government to the size established by the Constitution which created it. 3

Using the Federal “Budget” to Snap the Trap on an Unsuspecting People

Our Constitution doesn’t provide for a budget.

Spending is limited by the enumerated powers. Pursuant to Art. I, §9, clause 7, the Treasury is to publish periodic Statements and Accounts of the Receipts and Expenditures. Since the list of objects on which Congress is authorized to spend money is so short, it would be a simple matter to monitor federal spending and receipts.

But since the unconstitutional Budget & Accounting Act of 1921, Presidents and Congress have been putting into the “budget” whatever they want to spend money on.

Do you see that if the federal government is given constitutional authority (via a BBA) to spend money on whatever they want, they are ipso facto granted constitutional authority to exert power over whatever they want?

Oh, Americans! False friends lead you astray and confuse the path you should take. Under the pretext of imposing “fiscal responsibility” with a BBA, they would legalize the totalitarian dictatorship which has been developing in this Country for 100 years.

Creating the all-powerful federal government by Amendment

 Amendments supersede all language to the contrary in the existing Constitution.  For example, the 13th Amendment superseded Article I, Section 2, clause 3 & Article IV, Section 2, clause 3 because they were inconsistent with the 13th Amendment.

So a BBA, which would authorize Congress to spend money on whatever they or the President decide to put into the budget, would supersede the list of enumerated powers in our Constitution.

All spending on environmental regulation, education, welfare, abortions, etc., etc., etc., is now unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated.  But with a BBA, if these items are put into the budget, Congress would then have lawful authority to spend money on them.

So a BBA would transform the federal government created by our Constitution from one of enumerated powers only, to one of general and unlimited powers because it would authorize Congress to appropriate funds for – and hence have power over – whatever they or the President decide to put in the budget!

A BBA Wouldn’t Reduce Federal Spending

A BBA wouldn’t reduce federal spending because:

· all versions permit spending limits to be waived when Congress votes to waive them; and

· Congress can always “balance the budget” with tax increases. Compact for America’s “balanced budget amendment” delegates massive new taxing authority to Congress: it authorizes Congress to impose a national sales tax and a national value added tax (VAT) in addition to keeping the income tax.

Typical Misconceptions

Americans think, “I have to balance my budget; so the federal government should have to balance theirs.”

They overlook the profound distinctions between the economies of their own family unit and that of the national government of a Federation of States. Our federal Constitution sets up a system where Congress is to appropriate funds only to carry out the enumerated powers; and the bills are to be paid with receipts from excise taxes and import tariffs, with any shortfall being made up by a direct assessment on the States apportioned according to population (Art. I, §2, clause 3).

Americans also think that since States have balanced budget amendments, the federal government should have one. They overlook the profound distinction between the federal Constitution and State Constitutions: 4

· The federal government doesn’t need a budget because Congress’ spending is limited by the enumerated powers. Congress is to appropriate funds to carry out the handful of enumerated powers, and then it is to pay the bills with receipts from taxes.

· But State Constitutions created State governments of general and almost unlimited powers. Accordingly, State governments may lawfully spend money on just about anything. So State governments need budgets to limit their spending to receipts.

Conclusion

A BBA would have the opposite effect of what you have been told. Instead of limiting the federal government, it legalizes spending which is now unconstitutional as outside the scope of the enumerated powers; transforms the federal government into one which has power over whatever they decide to spend money on; and does nothing to reduce federal spending.

Endnotes:

1 State governments are voracious consumers of federal funds. THIS shows what percentage of your State’s revenue is from federal funds. Contrary to what RINO State Legislators say, they don’t want federal spending reduced: They want to keep those federal dollars flooding in.

2 George Washington’s Cabinet had 4 members: Secretary of War, Secretary of Treasury, Secretary of State, and Attorney General.

3 Our federal Constitution is short and easy to understand. The only way you can avoid being misled is to find out for yourself what it says. Be a Berean (Acts 17:10-12).

4 In Federalist No. 45 (3rd para from end), James Madison said:

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

Revised July 19, 2017

Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to Google BookmarkAdd to MySpaceAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Twitter

December 28, 2016 - Posted by | Amendments to the Constitution, Balanced Budget Amendment, federal spending, Federalist Paper No. 45, James Madison | , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

14 Comments »

  1. […] already limits the federal government to its enumerated powers; and any changes such as a Balanced Budget Amendment, will expand the power of the federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by News With Views | Meckler Admits “Convention of States” Won’t Solve The Problem | August 19, 2017 | Reply

  2. […] already limits the federal government to its enumerated powers; and any changes such as a Balanced Budget Amendment, will expand the power of the federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by Meckler Admits “Convention Of States” Won’t Solve The Problem! by Judi Caler | campconstitution.net | August 18, 2017 | Reply

  3. […] already limits the federal government to its enumerated powers; and any changes such as a Balanced Budget Amendment, will expand the power of the federal […]

    Like

    Pingback by Meckler Admits “Convention of States” Won’t Solve the Problem! | NoisyRoom.net | August 17, 2017 | Reply

  4. […] Unlike a “balanced budget” amendment, a term limits amendment is not one of the worst ideas since sin. But it doesn’t address the […]

    Like

    Pingback by Term Limits: A Palliative not a Cure « Publius-Huldah's Blog | June 3, 2017 | Reply

  5. Right on target. Thank you!

    Like

    Comment by Paul Breitenstine | January 17, 2017 | Reply

  6. Glad you continue to address this issue, Mom. Will be reblogging shortly. Blessings for a new year filled with health, love, and peace.
    ~Fluffy

    Like

    Comment by WatchmanMomma | January 1, 2017 | Reply

    • Thank you, Daughter! Let us hope this is not the year we lose our Constitution.

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by Publius Huldah | January 1, 2017 | Reply

      • Forgive me, but I’m from the last century and not as smart as the computer. You appear to have sent me a reply this morning, but I can’t see it for some reason. Can you please re-send? No hurry. Again, if I haven’t said so already, Happy New Year!

        Publius 50

        On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Publius-Huldah’s Blog wrote:

        > Publius Huldah commented: “Thank you, Daughter! Let us hope this is not > the year we lose our Constitution.” >

        Like

        Comment by Alan Glinsmann | January 1, 2017 | Reply

  7. Your treatise, as usual, relatively flawless. If you find yourself in Kansas City, I’d love to buy you and the Mr a meal.
    After the recent election, I’m hopeful for…just maybe…the beginning of gradual change in a positive way. But as you have said many times, it’s up to “we, the people”.
    Happy New Year!

    Publius 50

    Like

    Comment by Alan Glinsmann | December 30, 2016 | Reply

  8. PH, once again you have explained this subject so that even I understand it clearly. Thank you.

    Like

    Comment by Mike Foil | December 29, 2016 | Reply

    • Thank you, Mike. Please find a way to educate the Legislators in your State about this. Too many of them – Republicans – are falling for this scam.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 29, 2016 | Reply

  9. Reblogged this on Starvin Larry.

    Like

    Comment by gamegetterII | December 28, 2016 | Reply

  10. Madam, have you ever considered running for public office at the Federal level? We could certainly use a Constitutionally adherent mind to govern our once great nation. It has been soooooo long since we have had one.

    Like

    Comment by Robert Lee Taylor, III | December 28, 2016 | Reply

    • Alas, I haven’t sufficient funds to run a campaign. Of course, one wouldn’t need money to run for office IF the American People would help by spreading information and Truth. But they are not willing to do that – too much effort.

      But I am at the service of any person running for public office or existing office holder who wants to learn. And I don’t charge for my work.

      Thank you for your kind comments!

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 28, 2016 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: