Coming to Yoakum Texas: Should we have an Article V convention?
Come Hear The Pro and The Con Arguments regarding an Article V Convention.
January 6, 2017 - Posted by Publius Huldah | Uncategorized | Yoakum Texas
10 Comments »
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
PUBLIUS HULDAH
Categories
- 10th Amendment
- 12th Amendment
- 14th Amendment
- 14th Amendment citizens
- 17th Amendment
- 1st Amendment
- 20th amendment
- 28th Amendment
- 2nd Amendment
- 3000 page constitution
- 501 (c) (3) tax exemption
- Abortion
- Administrative Law
- Advice and Consent
- Alabama Heartbeat law
- Alan Keyes
- ALEC
- alien and sedition acts
- Allen C. Guelzo
- Amendments to the Constitution
- Amendments: Parental Rights Amendment
- American Legislative Exchange Council
- Anchor Babies
- annotated constitution
- Anti-Rights
- Arizona Illegal Alien Law
- Arizona Invasion
- Arizona Lawsuit
- Arizona's Proposition 200
- armed citizens
- Article I courts
- Article I, Sec. 2
- Article II, Sec. 2
- Article II, Sec. 3
- Article II, Sec. 4
- Article III Courts
- Article III, Sec. 1
- Article III, Sec. 2
- Article IV, Sec. 1
- Article IV, Sec. 4
- Article V
- Article V Convention
- Article VI
- Article VI, clause 2
- Article VI, clause 3
- Balance of Powers Act
- Balanced Budget Amendment
- Bible and civil government
- Bills of attainder
- Birthright citizenship
- Build the Wall!
- Bureau of Alcohol Firearms and Tobacco (ATF)
- Census
- Checks and Balances
- Chip DeMoss
- Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission
- Climate Change Treaty
- Code of Federal Regulations
- Commander in Chief
- Commerce clause
- common law
- Compact for America
- concealed carry reciprocity act
- Constitution is not a suicide pact
- constitutional convention
- Control the Border
- convention lobby
- Convention of States project
- Council on Foreign Relations
- coverture
- Creature of the Compact
- Criminal Code (US)
- cultural relativism
- Danbury Baptists
- Daniel Webster
- David Barton
- Declaration of Independence
- Definitions and Basic Concepts
- Delegates to a convention can't be controlled
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Labor
- Dick Act of 1903
- dog and pony show
- Donald Trump
- due process clause
- Edwin Vieira
- Einer Elhauge
- Elastic clause
- Election of President
- Election of U.S. Senators
- Elections Clause
- Electoral College
- Electors
- Engel v. Vitale
- enumerated powers
- Enumerated Powers of Congress
- Enumerated Powers of Federal Courts
- Enumerated powers of the president
- equal protection clause
- establishment clause
- ex post facto laws
- Exceptions clause
- excise taxes
- Exclusive and Concurrent Jurisdiction
- Executive Orders
- Existentialism
- Fabian socialism
- fabian socialists
- Faithful Delegate Laws
- Federal Convention of 1787
- federal enclaves
- Federal Form of government
- federal judges
- Federal Reserve Act of 1913
- federal spending
- Federalism
- Federalist No. 49
- Federalist Paper No. 45
- Federalist Paper No. 46
- Federalist Paper No. 78
- Federalist Paper No. 80
- Federalist Paper No. 83
- free and fair elections
- free exercise clause
- Free Speech
- full faith and credit clause
- General Welfare Clause
- George Mason
- George W. Bush
- Globalism
- God-given Rights
- Gov. Greg Abbott
- Guardians of the Constitution
- gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance – Auto Insurance analogy
- Heidi Cruz
- Heritage Foundation
- High crimes and misdemeanors
- homosexual marriage
- Hugo Black and the KKK
- IAMtv
- IMF Articles of Agreement
- Impeachment
- Imposts [tariffs]
- Incorporation doctrine
- International Monetary Fund
- Interposition
- Interstate Commerce Clause
- interstate conventions
- Isaiah 33:22
- Isaiah 3:12
- James Madison
- James Perloff
- Jarrett Stepman
- Jim Crow laws
- Jim DeMint
- Jordan Sillars
- Jucicial Review
- Judicial abstension
- Judicial Abuse
- Judicial Supremacy
- Kentucky Resolutions of 1798
- Kevin Gutzman
- Kim Davis
- Law of the Land
- Liberty Amendments
- Liberty Fest
- Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick
- Madison Coalition
- Madison's Journal of the Federal Convention of 1787
- Madison's letter to Edward Everett
- Madison's Notes on Nullification (1834)
- Madison's Report on the Virginia Resolutions (1799-1800)
- man made anti-rights
- Marbury v. Madison
- Marco Rubio
- Mark Levin
- marque and reprisal
- Marriage
- Marriage Amendment
- Martin Luther King
- Matthew Spalding
- Medicare
- Merchant Seamen healthcare
- Michael Farris
- Michael Seidman
- Militia
- multiculturalism
- National Popular Vote
- national sales tax
- national value added tax
- national VAT tax
- National Voter Registration Act
- natural born citizen
- Naturalized citizens
- Necessary and Proper clause
- New Hampshire Faithful Delegate Law
- Newspeak
- Nick Dranias
- North American Union
- not on the list
- Nullification
- nullification deniers
- Oath of Office
- obamacare
- on the list
- organic law
- Original and appellate jurisdiction
- Original Intent or Evolving Constitution?
- Parental Rights Amendment
- parentalrights.org
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Personal Responsibility
- Phony right wing
- Phyllis Schlafly
- Pledge of Allegiance
- political questions
- Pragmatism
- prayer in public schools
- precedents
- President's enumerated powers
- President's powers
- Presidential Electors
- prevailing dogma
- Professor David Super
- Progressive Education
- Progressives
- Publius Huldah
- Purpose of amendments to constitution
- Randy Barnett
- re-writing the Constitution
- Recess Appointments
- Red Flag Laws
- refugee resettlement
- Regulation Freedom Amendment
- Reserved Powers
- Resistance to tyranny
- Retained Powers
- Rights
- Rob Natelson
- Robert A. Levy Cato Institute
- Roe v. Wade
- Roman Buhler
- Rule of Law
- Rule of Man
- Rulemaking by Executive Agencies
- runaway convention
- safety nets for the poor
- same sex marriage
- Saul Alinsky
- secure these rights
- Self Government
- Sell out Republicans
- Sen. Mike Lee
- Separation of Church and State?
- separation of powers
- sharia
- shining city on a hill
- simulated convention
- social safety nets
- social security
- South Carolina nullification crisis
- Sovereign States
- Spineless Republicans
- States Retained Powers
- States Rights
- statute law
- Supremacy clause
- Supreme Court
- Supreme Law of the Land
- sweeping clause
- Tariff of Abominations
- Tarrif Act of 1828
- Ted Cruz
- Tennessee Constitution
- Tenth Amendment
- Term Limits Amendment
- The Fed
- The Judicial Branch
- The Liberty Amendments
- The taxing clause
- The Ten Commandments
- The Tennessee Resolutions
- Thomas Jefferson
- Transgenders in the military
- Treaty Making Powers of the United States
- Troxel v. Granville
- UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
- UN Declaration of Rights
- Uncategorized
- under the law
- unfaithful delegate laws
- Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
- United Nations
- United States-Mexico-Canada
- USMCA
- Usurpations of power
- Vattel
- Virginia Resolutions of 1798
- Voter eligibility
- Voter Qualifications
- Washington's Farewell Address
- What our Framers gave us
- what our Framers really said
- What States must do when the feds usurp power
- whiskey rebellion
- why convention was added to Art. V
- Wolf-PAC
Archives
- November 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (2)
- November 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (1)
- November 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
- February 2016 (5)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (1)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (1)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (1)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (1)
- July 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (2)
- March 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (4)
Pages
-
Recent Posts
- Clearing up the confusion about Marbury v. Madison
- Wolf PAC’s Application (supposedly for “fair and free elections”) for an Article V Convention
- So you think Trump wants to get rid of the Fed?
- Read the Commerce Clause in the Light cast by the other Parts of our Constitution
- How States can Man-up and Stop Abortion
- Alan Keyes and Publius Huldah discuss the Constitution and Judicial “supremacy”
- How to nullify Roe v. Wade
- Alan Keyes Liberty Fest flyer Pigeon Forge, TN April 27, 2019
- The USMCA “Trade Agreement” violates our Constitution and sets up Global Government
- Yes! Trump has constitutional authority to secure our Southern Border
Meta
- Thank you for subscribing! You should get a confirmation email. If you don't, check your spam file!
Does anyone know who is the core group pushing for this? I would bet there are no true conservatives but a lot of dems and treasonous rinos, though having a factual list would be very helpful as we could pressure the rinos on the list. The dems are a lost cause, at least in my mind.
LikeLike
for starters:
George Soros: He’s funding Constitution 2020 – they want a Marxist Constitution in place by the year 2020. He funds hundreds of progressive orgs pushing for a convention.
The Bush Family and their allies: They need a new Constitution to transform us from a sovereign nation to a member State in the North American Union
The Ford Foundation produced the Constitution for the Newstates of America.
Much of this is on my website. Look under the Categories for “Article V convention”, “North American Union”. The Bush Family is behind the NAU.
I address this in my speeches on the Art. V convention.
It’s all progressives and globalists – but some of them are posturing as “conservatives”.
I just emailed an attachment to you on this.
LikeLike
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/17402-socialists-and-soros-fight-for-article-v-convention
Mike be sure to read Joe’s paper linked here.
LikeLike
PH, thank you. As always I know I can count on you. I am reading Joe’s paper plus I sent information on it to Mark Levin in an effort to get him to reconsider his support for a CoS.
LikeLike
Check out his funding.
We need people to trace this kind of stuff. It appears that on the phony “right”, the big bucks funding the push for an Art. V convention originates from The Koch Brothers in Texas; and then goes to a host of pro Article V convention organizations; which then buy advocates. http://www.politico.com/story/2011/06/top-radio-talkers-sell-endorsements-056997
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Starvin Larry.
LikeLike
You go,Publius! Tell them where it’s at! Good luck.
LikeLike
Thanks! And I will.
LikeLike
If the “Pros” are correct they would all support the “Cons”. So it should become a Pro Con Convention.
LikeLike
I know! The use of “pro” and “con” are confusing!
LikeLike