Publius-Huldah's Blog

Understanding the Constitution

A Constitutional Roadmap for Conquering Election Fraud

By Publius Huldah

The following shows what the State Legislatures and each Branch of the federal government have the authority to do to address the monstrous crime which has been committed against our Country.

1. Article IV, §4, US Constitution

The fundamental Principle which should guide us in dealing with this issue is set forth at Article IV, §4, US Constitution. It reads,

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…”

The essence of a “Republic” is that sovereign power is exercised by Representatives elected, directly or indirectly, by The People. 1

Election fraud strikes at the heart of our Constitutional Republic. Therefore, Congress, the federal courts and the Executive Branch [i.e., the “United States”] have the duty, imposed by Article IV, §4, to negate the fraud in order to preserve our republican form of government.

As shown below, the States also have authority to remedy the election fraud committed in their State.

2. The Constitutional framework governing federal elections

These are the clauses in the US Constitution everyone should study:

♦ Art. I, §4 is the “times, places, and manner” clause: It means what it says! Federal and State judges, and federal and State executive agencies, have no authority to tinker with election laws made by the State Legislatures or Congress. When they tinker with the laws, their acts are usurpations and must be treated as such [link].

♦ Art. II, §1, clause 2: The President & Vice President are to be elected by Electors appointed, in such manner as the State Legislatures shall direct…

♦ Art. II, §1, clause 4: Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors and the Day on which they Vote.

♦ The 12th Amendment sets forth the procedures for how the Electors are to cast their votes for President & then for Vice President. To our detriment, we have ignored those procedures for a long time.

♦ The 20th Amendment, §1, says the terms of President & Vice President end January 20; and the terms of Senators & Representatives end January 3.

♦ And §2 of the 20th Amendment says Congress shall meet on January 3, unless they make a law setting a different date. Congress did make a law which changed that date to January 6.

3. The Statutory framework

At Title 3, US Code, §§ 1-21 [link], Congress implemented the constitutional provisions.

Congress understood there would be fights in the States over the selection of the Electors. So they provided for the fights:

A.

At 3 USC §1, Congress set November 3 as the date for appointing the Electors in the States.

But the next two Sections address what happens when Electors aren’t appointed on November 3.

♦ §2 says the Electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the Legislature of each State may direct.

♦ And §3 says Electors are chosen when any controversy respecting their appointment has been finally determined. “Determining the controversy” is, of course, the purpose of the litigation and the hearings in State Legislatures.

B.

Article II, §1, clause 4, US Constit., gives Congress authority to determine the Date on which the electors vote:

♦ 3 USC §7 sets that date for December 14.

♦ But 3 USC §§12 & 13 provide for what happens when Congress hasn’t received the Electors’ votes by December 23.

So we see that flexibility to deal with fights in the States over the selection of Electors is built into the US Code.

C.

Now we get to the counting of the Electors’ Votes in Congress: 3 USC §15 says Congress is to meet on January 6 to count the votes. The President of the Senate [Mike Pence] presides. He is to call for objections to the votes. The rest of §15 and §§16-18 deal with handling the objections in Congress respecting the Electors’ votes.

So the statutory framework recognizes that selecting the Presidential Electors can get messy; and that there would be fights over the Electors in the States and in Congress. We are working through this process right now.

4. Congress has the power to determine whether the President elect and Vice President elect are qualified for office.

Section 3 of the 20th Amendment shows that Congress has the authority to determine whether the President elect and Vice President elect are qualified for office. 2 If either is not a natural born citizen, Congress has the power and the duty to disqualify that person. 3 Accordingly, it was Congress’ duty to inquire into whether Obama was a natural born citizen; and today it is Congress’ duty to inquire into whether Kamala Harris is a natural born citizen.

Congress also has the power – and the duty – to disqualify Biden and Harris on the ground that the fraud bringing about their sham “election” was an attack on the States’ Right, guaranteed by Article IV, §4, to have a republican form of government.

5. Election Fraud is a federal crime

It is the DUTY of the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute the election fraud. It is disgraceful that they have done nothing.

6. The Duty of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is surely aware of its Duty, imposed by Article IV, §4, US Constitution, to guarantee to the States a republican form of government where Representatives are elected by The People – and not by corrupt politicians who pay for massive organized election fraud and cheating.

While the Supreme Court obviously cannot enforce its own rulings and must depend on the Executive Branch of the federal government to enforce them; 4 the Supreme Court must issue an Opinion consistent with Article IV, §4, which, when enforced by the Executive Branch of the federal government, solves the present crisis.

7. The State Legislatures should appoint replacement Electors

It is clear that State Legislatures have the power to ignore the fraudulent election and appoint a new set of Presidential Electors. Such is consistent with the Constitution and the statutory scheme laid out in 3 USC §§1-21. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has already acknowledged that State Legislatures may do this.

REMEMBER that Article II, §1, clause 2, US Constitution, says Electors are to be appointed “in such Manner as the State Legislatures” may direct.

Originally, Electors were generally chosen by the State Legislatures. In McPherson v. Blacker, decided 1892 [link], the Supreme Court gave the history of how each State Legislature chose their Electors since the first presidential election. It was only later that State Legislatures began to provide for the popular election of the Presidential Electors.

Congress expressly recognizes that State Legislatures may resume at any time the power to select the Electors. Remember that 3 USC §2, says,

“Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.”

Additionally, in Bush v. Gore, decided 2000 [link], the Supreme Court said that the State Legislature’s power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it chooses, select the Electors itself; and even after granting the franchise to the People to select the Electors, State Legislatures can resume the power at any time.

So yes, in States where the election was stolen, the State Legislatures may – and should – reassume their plenary power to select the Electors. America urges the State Legislators to be bold and do what is right.

8. Warning

Republican establishment cowards who refuse to confront and defeat the election fraud don’t seem to understand the consequences of their refusal to man up and fight the fraud. Our Country is right now in the process of being overthrown and taken over by profoundly evil people. You better fight while we still can.

Endnotes:

1 Federalist No. 10 (J. Madison) [link]: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, … *** … The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; …”

2 The qualifications are set forth at Article II, §1, clause 5 and the 12th Amendment, last sentence.

3 Whether or not a President elect or Vice President elect meet the constitutional qualifications for office is a political question for Congress to decide.

4 Federalist No. 78 (A. Hamilton) [link] “…The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.” [Caps are Hamilton’s; other emphasis added]

December 5, 2020 - Posted by | 12th Amendment, 20th amendment, Article I Sec. 4, Article II Sec. 1, Article II, Sec. 4, Article IV, Sec. 4, Election of President, Elections Clause, Electoral College, Electors, Kamala Harris, republican form of government | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

58 Comments »

  1. After Jan 21 there’ll be no free elections.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by tvfmontana | January 16, 2021 | Reply

    • actually, I have some ideas – a game plan for the States, really. Just looking for time to write it up.
      Hang in there!

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | January 16, 2021 | Reply

  2. Thank you so very much ❤ The Best is yet to come. You are a patriot. God Bless you

    Like

    Comment by Markeita Stacy | December 27, 2020 | Reply

    • I hope it comes soon – because I’m going grey!
      Seriously, thank you for your kind words and support. They really help.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 27, 2020 | Reply

  3. Please share this on Facebook

    Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
    Get Outlook for Android
    ________________________________

    Like

    Comment by Jennifer West | December 12, 2020 | Reply

  4. Good morning, Publius, not actually a good morning, just using polite words.

    So, what is your view on what will happen now? If the “supreme” court has denied the claim under Article III, what options does the President have? continue to file, as Sidney Powell did overnight? let the Electoral College certify the “results”, and challenge those? decide to wait and let the House assign the electors, which might be 26 to 24 in his favor?

    If you will allow the descriptor, the car has driven over the edge of the cliff, now it’s time for the sudden stop at the bottom. I don’t see any way to avoid the crunch, because if sleepy uncle joe does get chosen, the alternatives for independent thinking honest Americans are rather limited.

    His Peace to you.

    Like

    Comment by Grog | December 12, 2020 | Reply

    • I have NO IDEA what will happen. The Law has disappeared; so brute force and guts will determine what happens. And since our side is so proud of being “non-judgmental” and “nice” and not being “extreme”; I’m not optimistic.

      But let’s hope some Men are still around. The next few weeks will reveal a lot.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 12, 2020 | Reply

  5. Forgive me for being such a pest PH, but I have a question based upon the remarks from Rep Bingham’s in Congress in 1866;

    ” to secure to all persons “which includes every citizen of every State” their equal personal rights and if the tribunals of South Carolina will not respect the rights of the citizens of Massachusetts under the Constitution of their common country, I desire to see the Federal judiciary clothed with the power to take cognizance of the question, and assert those rights by solemn judgment,”

    My question is; By substituting PA and TX in the above has not 7 members of the Supreme Court of the United States violated the 14th Amendment?

    “I propose, with the help of this Congress and of the American people, that hereafter there shall not be any disregard of that essential guarantee of your Constitution (Art. IV, Sec. II) in any State of the Union. And how? By simply adding an amendment to the Constitution to operate on all the States of this Union alike, giving to Congress the power to pass all laws necessary and proper to secure to all persons “which includes every citizen of every State” their equal personal rights; and if the tribunals of South Carolina will not respect the rights of the citizens of Massachusetts under the Constitution of their common country, I desire to see the Federal judiciary clothed with the power to take cognizance of the question, and assert those rights by solemn judgment, inflicting upon the offenders such penalties as will compel a decent respect for this guarantee to all the citizens of every State … Well might the President demand, as he does demand in his message, ‘equal and exact justice to all men.’ That is precisely what is proposed to be accomplished.”–Rep. John Bingham (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 158 (1866))

    Like

    Comment by Douglas Smith | December 12, 2020 | Reply

    • I’m not going to comment on what could happen, what will happen, etc. I don’t know. and I won’t speculate on “what ifs”. Get prepared for the worst – and pray for the best.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 12, 2020 | Reply

  6. PH; I tried to email your blog to the United States Supreme Court for the last few days but I could not find an email address to all 9 or each separately. If looks as if 7 of them could have benefited from the info you provided above.

    Like

    Comment by Douglas Smith | December 11, 2020 | Reply

    • Thank you (and I agree with you!). But now I’m hoping that none of them are the “top people” mentioned in this video of the Chi com lecturing to a room full of masked lemmings: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qDwUEHnxkrWx/

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 12, 2020 | Reply

  7. […] Attorney Publius Huldah writes A Constitutional Roadmap for Conquering Election Fraud. […]

    Like

    Pingback by Publius Huldah: A Constitutional Roadmap for Conquering Election Fraud – Lower Valley Assembly | December 10, 2020 | Reply

  8. […] A Constitutional Roadmap for Conquering Election Fraud […]

    Like

    Pingback by A Constitutional Roadmap for Conquering Election Fraud | Gila GOP | December 10, 2020 | Reply

  9. Reading all the comments and suggestions I am puzzled by one thing. In order to take the office of Senator/Rep., not only on the Federal level but the states as well, one must upon being dually elected swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that they will uphold the Constitution of the United States and/or their Union state. If they don’t then that is a crime against the people. Now, if Joe Biden and Kamala Harris swear to uphold the Constitution, seeing they didn’t in order to be elected, wouldn’t that be false swearing, perjury of oath, or perhaps, levying war against the people? Or does that just make them blatant hypocrites. This inquiring mind would like to know.

    Like

    Comment by Douglas Smith | December 8, 2020 | Reply

    • “violation of oath of office” is not a crime. And for good reason: I say the Constitution means this. John Doe says it means that. Which of us is the “criminal”? do you see the problem with criminalizing “violation of oath of office”? That’s why it isn’t a “crime”.

      But many elected officials have committed election fraud, conspiracy to commit election fraud, etc. Some of them have committed treason against the United States (Art. III, Sec. 3, US Constitution). Tucker Carlson’s video of last night (Dec 7) laid the Treason case out. But you-tube took his video down.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 8, 2020 | Reply

      • Oddly,

        As one once sworn under Oath of Office gave question directly to governor when questioning “violations of Oath of office.” Her commit, “the Oath of office is a frivolous formality”, led to my forced resignation in state law enforcement.

        So, for those who find any sitting in bad behavior sworn otherwise, take upon yourselves the mantle of joint tenancy of the sovereignty of America and, anchor your estates upon more sound mooring by judging both small and great matters, which have all come about from bad behavior under “Oath of Office” and let justice been done to our Republic!

        Like

        Comment by mr.seaking | December 8, 2020 | Reply

        • I have no idea what you are talking about! Can you say it in plain English?

          Like

          Comment by Publius Huldah | December 9, 2020 | Reply

          • When a person runs for public office in which an oath is required in order to assume that office and that person takes the oath and then violates that oath then those that voted for that person have been defrauded. At least that is how I feel when the states legislatures don’t adhere to their oaths by ignoring the Constitution they have sworn to uphold.

            As to what Mr. seaking said. He witnessed this transgression and reported it and was forced to resign. This sends a message to the rest of America that we must make a choice to feed our families, pay our bills etc. or stand up for what is right and join the ranks of the unemployed.

            This conduct is, in part, the “swamp” we need to get rid of in order save our Republic. That’s why I voted for Donald Trump and continue to read your blogs. As to the voter fraud that is running rampant, I think we need to be able to file a criminal complaint when a subjective opinion or belief, as to the interpretations of the Constitutions, is so outlandish and rediculous that it could not pass scrutiny.

            I, personally, have had to make that choice myself. My challenge to some of the laws in Oregon have resulted in the statement “Do not stop. Do not detain. Considered dangerous.” popping up on the NCIC computers in the patrol cars when the officer would enter my name. My wife could not take the stress of not knowing if when I left the house I was not lying in a ditch somewhere dead so I had to choose to save my marriage. I am still married.

            I’m sure you experience the same for your “disobedience” to the swamp and standing up for the people of America. For that, I say “God Bless PH”

            Like

            Comment by Douglas Smith | December 9, 2020

          • Jim, I don’t have time to read it! but I expect you know enough to know whether what he says is right or not.

            Liked by 1 person

            Comment by Publius Huldah | December 12, 2020

          • 1. About the alleged [but non-existent] crime of “violation of oath of office”: did you see this?

            violation of oath of office” is not a crime. And for good reason: I say the Constitution means this. John Doe says it means that. Which of us is the “criminal”? AND WHO DECIDES? Do you see the problem with criminalizing “violation of oath of office”? That’s why it isn’t a “crime”.

            2. The Executive Branch “holds the sword”. Private Citizens have no power to prosecute people [think lynch mobs]. Only the Executive Branch has the power to prosecute crimes. AG Bill Barr is the one who should have prosecuted these obvious instances of election fraud. He has failed to do so. Perhaps he is a Chi-com puppet.

            3. I do think we are in the worst crisis of our entire history. Worse that the Revolution of 1776 and the War for Southern Secession during the 1860s. If we lost the Revolution, we’d still have been ruled by the English King. After losing the War of the 1860s, the South was ruled by other Americans. But with this election fraud, we are on our way to having an open takeover of our Country by the Chi-coms. It boggles my mind that some Americans are so short-sided and greedy for money that they would sell us out to the Chi-coms.

            Like

            Comment by Publius Huldah | December 12, 2020

  10. Publius, YOU are a “Fantastic” AMERICAN LADY!!!!

    GOD Bless and keep up the great job of presenting the “facts” to all…….

    ________________________________

    Like

    Comment by woodlandwilly | December 7, 2020 | Reply

    • Thank you, Woodland Willy, for getting my day off to a great start!

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 7, 2020 | Reply

  11. As to the constitutional eligibility of both Obama and Harris, concerning their non-natural born citizen status, It was Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, who falsely certified that Obama met the qualification of being a natural born citizen and you can bet that Pelosi did the same for Kamala Harris. What really disgusts me is the fact that NONE of the Republicans in either House raised any objections, instead they covered for Obama and Harris. As far as I am concerned, Pelosi and the rest of her ilk are nothing more than TRAITORS to the United States, and must be treated accordingly.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by Most Rev, Gregori | December 6, 2020 | Reply

    • and it boggles my mind that Republicans in Congress are such spineless cowards. What are they so afraid of that they refuse to challenge the Left?

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 6, 2020 | Reply

      • Could it be that the leftists have a lot of dirt on the Republicans, or has the left made real threats of bodily harm to the Republicans and their families. Any thing is possible.

        Like

        Comment by Most Rev, Gregori | December 6, 2020 | Reply

        • I don’t know, Abouna. It has occurred to me that a LOT of money is changing hands. I expect that the bought off Republican politicians have no idea what communism is and what is going to happen here if Biden/Marris take office. And so they are selling out.

          Apparently, the woman Republican candidate for US Senate seat in Georgia bought Dominion stock at the time the Georgia Secretary of State and the governor’s chief of Staff made the deal letting Dominion voting machines be used. Our politicians are rotten to the core.

          And yes, blackmail is always a powerful control.

          I’ll fight to the end to defeat the cheats; but if we lose the War, I pray that God will be merciful to His remnant!

          Liked by 1 person

          Comment by Publius Huldah | December 6, 2020 | Reply

  12. I agree. This is a travesty of justice. The President could use Marshall Law and demand a new election, this time with strict oversight.

    Like

    Comment by Suzanne Torres | December 6, 2020 | Reply

    • Martial law? Be careful what you ask for. Yikes!

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 6, 2020 | Reply

  13. Love this, Publius!

    Like

    Comment by Cristi Ritchey | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • thank you, Cristi!

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  14. Publius Huldah, you are the master. I bow to your knowledge and your love for our country.
    God Bless you. Please take of yourself, we need you (our nation needs you) so badly.

    Like

    Comment by Robert Lee Taylor, III | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • Please take ‘care’ of yourself, we need you (our nation needs you) so badly.

      Like

      Comment by Robert Lee Taylor, III | December 5, 2020 | Reply

      • Remember: I will never “commit suicide”.

        Like

        Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • THANK YOU! I do take care of myself and I will NEVER “commit suicide”.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  15. Sorry if I am sending too much. I posted but cannot see it! I am logged in it says. Please allow me to post my question to you again:

    Mrs. Martin:
    I am hearing of a process during the count of the electoral vote in the joint session of the U.S. Congress, where a state congressman from Alabama, Mo Brooks says he can object to an electoral selection. If some member does, Mo Brooks says the House get 2 hours of debate, and the Senate gets 2 hours of debate.

    Please tell the mechanics of this. When Mo Brooks of Alabama opposes the electors from Pennsylvania as he promises he will do, How is that voted on? Does it take 2/3rd, or a simple majority? Does it take the Senate to also vote on his opposition? And, if so, what constitutes a majority?

    I assume he is striving to stop the the count for Biden to not make the necessary 270 count. I am also assuming once that acts of opposition have ended, and neither candidate has the necessary 270 electoral votes, then the election goes to the House of Representatives for President and then to the Senate for Vice President, where the state caucuses will decide the outcome. The current count is 26 for the Republicans and 20 for the Democrats, and the balance are mixed or Independent.

    A Dedicated friend from Memphis, TN Campaign for Liberty,
    Raymond Rider

    Like

    Comment by rwrider | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  16. What do you think about WeThePeopleConvention.org’s ad asking President Trump to declare martial law and conduct a national revote?

    Jason

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    Like

    Comment by jrbilyj | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • Yikes! I looked them up. I can’t determine whether the instigator is a complete idiot or a subversive. If the former, he has no idea what “martial law” is. If he did, he wouldn’t be advocating for it.

      And anyone who believes that a “national” re-vote is a good idea is a blithering idiot or a subversive.

      Always inquire as to what peoples’ credentials are.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  17. So, how do we get individual states to replace electors, and the Supreme Court to do their duty?

    Like

    Comment by Debra Biffert | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • Well, I wrote the Paper which explains and proves what State Legislators have the constitutional authority to do.
      Now it’s up to The People to get the information to the State Legislators and to encourage them to do it. The People MUST get involved.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  18. Thank you

    If Kamela Harris believed they won the election she should have resigned her Senate seat (based on Biden’s belief he is the incoming President).

    There is no indication that she knows any of what is documented below but she is shrewd enough to not give up her day-job.

    Floyd

    _____

    Like

    Comment by Floyd Rathbun | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • Yep!

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  19. Have exhausted one’s own knowledge and life in service of both Republic & Honor above all else, sure Wish I had a way to directly contact you for good neighborly direction touching upon ‘unconstitutional conditions’ with 5 volume manuscript (hardbound) under document certification by notary, presented to Tort Branch Director (U.S.D.J.) and in retort, informing could not investigate I.R.S., Treasury Department or supreme Court for obstruction of justice…lol At least from the point of his point of view, when he converted a constitution claim into a statutory tort, that arose these past 2yrs from an associate lady friend (a mastered prepared nurse of 40yrs) being forced to be vaccinated just to work while under medical counsel, directing her employer to take notice of her medical history, upon which she was summarily termination when doing her best to provide for both her health and those as a caregiver honorably seeks for all in good will.

    Anyhow, leave a note how to contact directly should our missive find honor & conation ashore.

    Be blessed,
    Arthur

    Like

    Comment by mr.seaking | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • My email is publiushuldah@gmail.com

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

      • Hi,

        I answer your return response with 2 earlier emails, which gave explanations for posting and otherwise, germane..

        Please review and respond as you wish.

        be blessed, Arthur

        On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 5:12 PM Publius-Huldah’s Blog wrote:

        > Publius Huldah commented: “My email is publiushuldah@gmail.com” >

        Like

        Comment by mr.seaking | December 5, 2020 | Reply

        • Jog my memory!

          Like

          Comment by Publius Huldah | December 6, 2020 | Reply

  20. Please make this shareable so I can post all over social media. Thank you!!!

    Sent from my iPad

    >

    Like

    Comment by Margo Knutson | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  21. Reblogged this on Starvin Larry.

    Like

    Comment by gamegetterII | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  22. Outstanding piece of literary knowledge of our constitution on election law. Written so that any high school student of a civics class can understand. Something to fold and place into our own copy of the Constitution. Kudos to you Publius for doing this. Jack Adams

    Like

    Comment by Jack Adams | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • Thank you, Jack. When I write, I cast my mind back to the time when I didn’t know what I am writing about; and so I explain it as I would have liked to have had it explained to me.

      I think that is the secret to how to write clearly about complex topics.

      Like

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  23. This post needs to go to every Republican senator asap!!! And we need to urge them to stand up and be counted for the American people!!! No more compromise with evil!!

    Liked by 4 people

    Comment by Jane Lee | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • Thank you, Jane! Yes all Republican legislators need to see this and read it and look up the cites to see if what I said is True. Do you still have the mailing addresses for your State Legislators? tonight I hope to have time to prepare a blast alert for the 6 battleground States. I’ll send to you of course since you are on my List for your State.

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

      • Thank you PH ! I will get copies to all my SC legislators!! I can’t thank you enough for this post and all your hard work!! God bless you abundantly!

        Like

        Comment by Jane lee | December 5, 2020 | Reply

        • Thank you, Jane Lee!

          Like

          Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  24. This is an OUTSTANDING well researched and well written piece of Constitutional Law. I am giving you a standing ovation. Can I have your permission to try to make this go more viral than it already is? EVERY citizen of The United States of America needs to read this. Thanks you so much for this and thank you for doing it in such a timely manner to correct this grave injustice and attach on our representative republic.

    Liked by 2 people

    Comment by Bruce Robert Isaachsen | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • Yes, please make it go viral. State legislators don’t know that they have constitutional and statutory authority, as well as the blessing of the Supreme Court, to ignore the results of the fake election and select the Presidential Electors themselves. And we need The People to understand this so that they can pressure their Republican Legislators in the State Legislatures to man-up and fight the fraud by selecting the Presidential Electors themselves. Republicans are notoriously lacking in boldness & spine and they have to be pushed to do what is right.

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply

  25. THANK YOU! I plan to share this with my friends, online and offline. At this time, the President’s close adherence to his Oath of Office may be the only thing standing between tyranny and a constitutional repubiic.

    Like

    Comment by jim delaney | December 5, 2020 | Reply

    • Thank you, Jim! Please do share. We must get Americans to look for papers with solid legal arguments which are proven by citations to authority – instead of the sensational rubbish which floods the internet. Also, we need to energize the People so that they will make such a loud cry and huge peaceful protests that the Supreme Court Justices will take notice. Yes! SCOTUS Justices are influenced by outcries from The People.

      Liked by 2 people

      Comment by Publius Huldah | December 5, 2020 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: