Why was the Convention Method put into Article V?
See this – only 3.5 minutes:
But for the complete story of what happened at the Federal Convention of 1787 respecting the development of Article V, read this: https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/article-v/
February 4, 2015 - Posted by Publius Huldah | Article V, Article V Convention, constitutional convention, Convention of States project | Article V, Article V Convention, constitutional convention, Convention of States project, Federal Convention of 1787
6 Comments »
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
PUBLIUS HULDAH
Categories
- 10th Amendment
- 12th Amendment
- 14th Amendment
- 14th Amendment citizens
- 17th Amendment
- 1st Amendment
- 20th amendment
- 28th Amendment
- 2nd Amendment
- 501 (c) (3) tax exemption
- Abortion
- Administrative Law
- Advice and Consent
- alien and sedition acts
- Allen C. Guelzo
- Amendments to the Constitution
- Amendments: Parental Rights Amendment
- Anchor Babies
- Anti-Rights
- Arizona Illegal Alien Law
- Arizona Invasion
- Arizona Lawsuit
- Arizona's Proposition 200
- armed citizens
- Article II, Sec. 2
- Article II, Sec. 3
- Article II, Sec. 4
- Article III Courts
- Article III, Sec. 1
- Article III, Sec. 2
- Article IV, Sec. 1
- Article IV, Sec. 4
- Article V
- Article V Convention
- Article VI
- Article VI, clause 2
- Article VI, clause 3
- Balance of Powers Act
- Balanced Budget Amendment
- Bible and civil government
- Bills of attainder
- Bureau of Alcohol Firearms and Tobacco (ATF)
- Census
- Checks and Balances
- Chip DeMoss
- Climate Change Treaty
- Commerce clause
- Compact for America
- Constitution is not a suicide pact
- constitutional convention
- convention lobby
- Convention of States project
- Council on Foreign Relations
- coverture
- Creature of the Compact
- Criminal Code (US)
- cultural relativism
- Danbury Baptists
- David Barton
- Declaration of Independence
- Definitions and Basic Concepts
- Delegates to a convention can't be controlled
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Labor
- Dick Act of 1903
- Donald Trump
- due process clause
- Edwin Vieira
- Einer Elhauge
- Elastic clause
- Election of President
- Election of U.S. Senators
- Elections Clause
- Electoral College
- Electors
- Engel v. Vitale
- enumerated powers
- Enumerated Powers of Congress
- Enumerated Powers of Federal Courts
- Enumerated powers of the president
- equal protection clause
- establishment clause
- ex post facto laws
- Exceptions clause
- Exclusive and Concurrent Jurisdiction
- Executive Orders
- Existentialism
- Fabian socialism
- Faithful Delegate Laws
- Federal Convention of 1787
- federal enclaves
- Federal Form of government
- federal spending
- Federalism
- Federalist Paper No. 45
- Federalist Paper No. 46
- free exercise clause
- full faith and credit clause
- General Welfare Clause
- George Mason
- George W. Bush
- God-given Rights
- Gov. Greg Abbott
- Guardians of the Constitution
- gun control
- Health Care
- Health Insurance – Auto Insurance analogy
- Heidi Cruz
- Heritage Foundation
- High crimes and misdemeanors
- homosexual marriage
- Hugo Black and the KKK
- Impeachment
- Incorporation doctrine
- Interposition
- Interstate Commerce Clause
- Isaiah 33:22
- Isaiah 3:12
- Islamization (Islamification)
- James Madison
- Jarrett Stepman
- Jim Crow laws
- Jim DeMint
- Jordan Sillars
- Judicial abstension
- Judicial Abuse
- Kentucky Resolutions of 1798
- Kevin Gutzman
- Kim Davis
- Liberty Amendments
- Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick
- Madison's Notes on Nullification (1834)
- Madison's Report on the Virginia Resolutions (1799-1800)
- man made anti-rights
- Marbury v. Madison
- Marco Rubio
- Mark Levin
- marque and reprisal
- Marriage
- Marriage Amendment
- Martin Luther King
- Matthew Spalding
- Medicare
- Merchant Seamen healthcare
- Michael Farris
- Michael Seidman
- Militia
- multiculturalism
- National Popular Vote
- national sales tax
- national value added tax
- national VAT tax
- natural born citizen
- Naturalized citizens
- Necessary and Proper clause
- New Hampshire Faithful Delegate Law
- Nick Dranias
- North American Union
- not on the list
- Nullification
- nullification deniers
- Oath of Office
- obamacare
- on the list
- Original and appellate jurisdiction
- Original Intent or Evolving Constitution?
- Parental Rights Amendment
- parentalrights.org
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Personal Responsibility
- Phony right wing
- Phyllis Schlafly
- Pledge of Allegiance
- political questions
- Pragmatism
- prayer in public schools
- President's enumerated powers
- President's powers
- Presidential Electors
- prevailing dogma
- Progressive Education
- Progressives
- Randy Barnett
- re-writing the Constitution
- Recess Appointments
- refugee resettlement
- Reserved Powers
- Resistance to tyranny
- Retained Powers
- Rights
- Rob Natelson
- Robert A. Levy Cato Institute
- Rule of Law
- Rule of Man
- Rulemaking by Executive Agencies
- safety nets for the poor
- same sex marriage
- Saul Alinsky
- secure these rights
- Self Government
- Sell out Republicans
- Sen. Mike Lee
- Separation of Church and State?
- separation of powers
- sharia
- shining city on a hill
- social safety nets
- social security
- South Carolina nullification crisis
- Sovereign States
- Spineless Republicans
- States Retained Powers
- States Rights
- Supremacy clause
- Supreme Court
- Supreme Law of the Land
- sweeping clause
- Tariff of Abominations
- Tarrif Act of 1828
- Ted Cruz
- Tennessee Constitution
- Tenth Amendment
- Term Limits Amendment
- The Liberty Amendments
- The taxing clause
- The Tennessee Resolutions
- Thomas Jefferson
- Treaty Making Powers of the United States
- Troxel v. Granville
- UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
- UN Declaration of Rights
- Uncategorized
- under the law
- Usurpations of power
- Vattel
- Virginia Resolutions of 1798
- Voter eligibility
- Voter Qualifications
- What States must do when the feds usurp power
Archives
- June 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
- February 2016 (5)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (1)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (1)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (1)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (1)
- July 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (2)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (2)
- March 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (4)
Pages
-
Recent Posts
- The George Mason Fabrication
- Term Limits: A Palliative not a Cure
- Don’t Fall for the National Popular Vote – Enforce the Electoral College!
- Exposing the real agenda behind the push for an Article V convention
- Compact for America’s Scheme for Pre-ratification of a Massive New Taxes Amendment
- The TOP DOWN push for an Article V convention
- An Article V convention is an imminent threat to our US Constitution
- How to use Article V of our Constitution to move us into the North American Union
- Coming to Yoakum Texas: Should we have an Article V convention?
- Balanced Budget Amendment: The Solution? Or Deathblow?
Meta
- Thank you for subscribing! You should get a confirmation email. If you don't, check your spam file!
Article V provides for an AMENDING convention, not a constitutional convention. Applications limit the scope of the convention. Congress acknowledges this because it has refused to aggregate applications for different purposes or amendment specific conventions. States can define the qualifications and duties of delegates, who represent the sovereign states. The delegates are NOT sovereigns but there as agents of the states. In 1787, the States convened a convention to revise the Articles of Confederation to make it suitable for the exigencies of the new union. The new constitution was submitted to the continental congress, which endorsed it unanimously (RI was absent). Although the ratification was changed from all states to 9 states, NO STATE was bound unless it ratified it. Right now we are witnessing a “runaway” federal government. Some here say we just need to follow the constitution, not amend it. How illogical is it to advocate IGNORING Article V of the Constitution? You are advocating precisely what you say you oppose. You have faith in states to nullify unconstitutional laws but you turn around and claim states can’t be trusted with a convention of states? Well, do you trust legislators or not? The fact is that electing “better” politicians alone will not reverse bad Supreme Court decisions such as Kelo v. City of New London. Only an amendment which restores the Framers’ original meaning of “public use” can correct it. Instead of making personal attacks against fellow conservatives, I recommend joining us. There is a growing political consensus that the federal government is out of control. If you believe in the Constitution, then follow it. Article V is a specific “check” on the power of the federal government. It is a necessary one. If we don’t use it, federal power will continue to grow regardless of the majority power in control.
LikeLike
My goodness – there is very little truth in what you write! I have already addressed the points you recite – for starters, read with an open mind, my two most recent papers on my website.
And for heavens sake look up and read the hyperlinks!
THEN come back and we will address any remaining questions you may have.
LikeLike
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to finally listen to you in action. Quite grand, and I will keep asking states to give you the opportunity to speak. Kindest to you.
LikeLike
My father told me sixty years ago we didn’t need a new Constitution, we just need to get rid of the people who trash the one we have.
LikeLike
Your are shining like the North Star; a beacon of hope on a cold dark cloudless night.
Today we will make ready for battle and do pledge our lives and our good fortunes.
For it is better to have fought the noble fight and lost, than to live forever in darkness.
May the peace of God that transcends all thought be your strength and your shield. SLL
LikeLike
Nuts!! I’m still trying to update my Adobe so I can look at/read things, and am having NO LUCK!! But eventually I’ll get it. . .
LikeLike